Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:47:03 +0100
• To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <480770F7.2080404@hpl.hp.com>

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> I propose to close ISSUE-57 as none of the problematic pieces of
> the OWL 1.0 documents survive in the OWL 2 documents.
> 
> 
> peter
> 

No.

While peter is correct in the observation, the issue also lists a number 
of comments which might merit errata against the OWL 1 docs, and I think 
this group should at some point consider them, and make errata on the 
OWL 1 docs as required.

i.e. we have some obligation for on-going maintenance of the OWL1 specs, 
even though our primary task is OWL2.

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 17 April 2008 15:48:36 UTC