Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] from Jeremy Carroll on 2008-04-23 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:34:19 +0100
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <480EF48B.1050703@hpl.hp.com>

Bijan Parsia wrote:

>>   "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of OWL-x.
> 
> I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.
> 

me too

I hope there is somewhere to record my -epsilon .... :)

J

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:35:14 UTC