- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:21:38 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I don't think "OWL 2 Specification" is a very good way to refer to "OWL
2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style
Syntax". That seems to suggest, to me, that the document is the
specification of OWL.... Can we just call it "OWL 2 Syntax"? That's
not a great name, either, since it's only one of several OWL 2 Syntaxes,
but .... I guess "OWL 2 SSFSS" at least isn't misleading (since it's not
"leading" at all). Oh well, I guess we'll sort this out later.
-- Sandro
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 17:23:08 UTC