- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:48:40 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:33, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Ian Horrocks wrote: >> If we want to change the names then we should do it *soon* -- the >> existing names are already in wide circulation, and the longer we >> leave it the more difficult and confusing name changes will become. >> Ian > > > Is there anything *wrong* with the current names? > (e.g. is any name a trade mark, or something that is already overly > aligned with a particularly vendor? Nope. > Or offensive in some relevant natural language? etc. etc.) > A separate question is are there any better names? Well, I always hear a post-incremented Evil Laugh when someone types EL++...by that may be an idiosyncratic recation. DL Lite has the potential for several sorts of confusion (i.e., with OWL DL, with OWL Lite, etc.) OWL-R is, afaict, widely loathed. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 15:46:46 UTC