- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:58:39 -0400
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: "Alan Wu" <alan.wu@oracle.com>, "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I apologize, but someone asked me to forward this "oldie but goodie" to the Working Group - perhaps it will help with your current issues: from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0300.html > As we move to CR, we can expect a great number of implementations to > start. In order to help I have prepared a list of some useful > acronyms for people to use: > > BOWL - Comes with an ontology for Bocce and petanque > COWL - Covers the OWL language completely > DOWL - This version of OWL has our recommendation pegged > FOWL - Full OWL implemented poorly > HOWL - For users who previously tried FOWL > JOWL - no actual implementation, but lots of people jawing about its > features > POWL - special implementation for the US secretary of state > TOWL - Don't Panic if you know where you TOWL is > VOWL - only implements five and a half features > GROWL - For users who previously tried VOWL > PROWL - Professional OWL, used for web crawlers > SCOWL - semi-complete OWL, can't trust its results > SPROWL - graphics heavy edition, co-implemented with Van Dam > > I look forward to hearing your favorites...
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 20:59:18 UTC