Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles

Ian Horrocks wrote:
> 
> If we want to change the names then we should do it *soon* -- the 
> existing names are already in wide circulation, and the longer we leave 
> it the more difficult and confusing name changes will become.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 


Is there anything *wrong* with the current names?
(e.g. is any name a trade mark, or something that is already overly 
aligned with a particularly vendor? Or offensive in some relevant 
natural language? etc. etc.)

A separate question is are there any better names?

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 15:34:59 UTC