- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:20:09 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
i did another pass over the primer doc. i made one suggested update to the new status description- it is just in a review mode comment so you can choose to accept or not. Suggest changing: The OWL Working Group particular solicits feedback on the content of the "technology perspectives" from the point of view of practitioners in those areas. to The OWL Working Group solicits feedback on how to improve and update the document. In particular, the group solicits feedback on the content of the "technology perspectives" from the point of view of practitioners in those areas. i also fixed a couple of little typos (including one in one of ivan's comments but it was just spelling). i updated a couple of my inline review comments where they had been somewhat or completely addressed. i sent email to sandro asking for the best way to fix the link issue at the end on the 1.0 docs. i can update the links or sandro or bijan can once we understand the right way to do it. minus that link issue, i think this completes my action item to review at this point. deborah Bijan Parsia wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2008, at 14:34, Deborah L. McGuinness wrote: > >> >> I am supposed to do a review of the primer after bijan does his updates. >> I have not seen email that it is ready to have the pass done but i >> can do one later today if it is ready. i will look for notice that >> the updates are ready later today. > > I did one update at the f2f but the section on OWL 1 orientation isn't > done yet (got distracted). We Mancunians just got in this morning so > are a little laggy. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 04:21:21 UTC