ISSUE-110 (CURIE vs. QName): Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification from OWL Working Group Issue Tracker on 2008-04-03 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008)

From: OWL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:29:20 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080403192920.367CF6B63E@tibor.w3.org>

ISSUE-110 (CURIE vs. QName): Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/

Raised by: Elisa Kendall
On product: 

Recent comments from the Protocols and Formats WG on the Last Call RDFa documents indicate that there may be issues in referencing / following the approach for using namespace prefixes per the CURIE syntax given in http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-curie-20071126/.

These include additional complexity in parsing as well as lack of support in HTML.  See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0031.html for details and potential recommendations.

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 19:29:54 UTC