- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:03:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: schneid@fzi.de
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> Subject: RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:44:29 +0200 > [slightly related to ISSUE-116] > > Hi Peter! > > I was about to revise the axiomatic triples, but wasn't clear on some point: > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 > in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0249.html>: > > >5/ The RDFS-compatible semantics for OWL 1.0 would be incorrect if > > owl:FunctionalProperty rdfs:subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty > > Why is this an error? All instances of the class 'owl:FunctionalProperty' > will certainly be instances of the class rdf:Property, right? And in OWL > Full, the classes 'rdf:Property' and 'owl:ObjectProperty' have identical > class extensions, according to sec. 5.3 of the AS&S. So the above axiomatic > triple is equivalent to > > owl:FunctionalProperty rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Property Yes, in OWL 1 Full, but not in the RDFS-compatible semantics for OWL 1 DL. In OWL 1 DL there can be functional data properties, which are not object properties. > > was an axiomatic triple. Similarly for the domain and range of > > owl:sameAs and owl:differentFrom. Similarly for the domain and range > > of owl:equivalentProperty and the range of owl:onProperty and > > owl:hasValue. > > Analogue questions here. The respective axiomatic triples can be found in: > > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=FullSemanticsAxiomaticTripl > es&oldid=4861> owl:Thing is only the entire RDF domain in OWL 1 Full, not in the RDFS-compatbile semantics for OWL 1 DL, stating that the domain and range of owl:sameAs is owl:Thing makes owl:Thing be the entire domain, even in OWL 1 DL. > Of course, if you mean that using 'owl:ObjectProperty' instead of > 'rdf:Property' might be confusing (although being technically ok), then I > will change this everywhere. > > Cheers, > Michael peter
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 01:06:10 UTC