Re: Names for top and bottom properties

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:17 +0200, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

> I propose we go for the pragmatic solution, and just use the words we  
> (as WG) already use to refer to these properties: topProperty and  
> bottomProperty.

+1
-- 
Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:53:00 UTC