RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams

• From: Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@nist.gov>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:58:51 -0400
• To: "'Elisa F. Kendall'" <ekendall@sandsoft.com>, "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Cc: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <028201c89ff3$e8faf7d0$b3200681@MEL.NIST.GOV>

Peter,

 > I propose to accept that the diagrams may not be not ideal UML and
 > invite the raiser of the issue to make specific uggestions for
 > changes to them.

The specific changes are given in:

  http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/82

Start at the second paragraph of the issue.


 > I propose to reject alignment between the UML diagrams in the Syntax
 > document and the OMG ODM, as the purpose of the diagrams in FS&SS is
 > very different from the purpose of the OMG ODM.

Our understanding from dicussion with Ian is that we are to raise
specific issues in the alignment.  We'd like the opportunity to do that.

Conrad

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:59:38 UTC