- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:29:06 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 12, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Bijan, > > an additional comment, related to what I wrote in my previous mail > on DL Lite vs OWL-R; I wonder whether a slightly different > organization would not help: > > > - Intro > - EL++ > - Some title here (simple profile or sg) > - DL Lite > - OWL-R > - OWL 1 species > > What I mean is: I see quite a lot of things that are identical in > DL Lite and OWL-R, both in the possible users and in some of the > characteristic features. Factoring out those commonalities might be > helpful, and then we could have one section on DL Lite, emphasizing > its connection to the DB world, and OWL-R, emphasizing its rule > aspect. > > What do you think? Seems reasonable. OTOH, perhaps we don't want to overstate the similarities. There's a sense in which what we write will go a fair bit of the way to *making* the respective communities have a certain flavor. Scares me a bit :) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Sunday, 13 April 2008 10:29:39 UTC