Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] from Bijan Parsia on 2008-04-23 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:28:45 +0100
To: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
Cc: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4408F673-13AF-4CD9-9355-D77FEC98D133@cs.man.ac.uk>

On 23 Apr 2008, at 09:18, Michael Schneider wrote:
[snip]
> So I plea the chairs to re-open this issue.
>
> My proposal would then be to
>
>   close ISSUE-113 as REJECTED
>
> optionally with a note in the documents that
>
>   "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of OWL-x.

I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.

BTW, that's not new information. It was definitely discussed multiple  
times.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:26:47 UTC