- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:37:48 +0200
- To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 13:38:45 UTC
Boris, it may be still time to handle that before publication: in the OWL-R rule description you use owl:equivalentProperties (twice) in Table 2. You also use it in Table 5. It should all be equivalentProperty (ie, singular), per [1] That, actually, raises the small editorial issue whether owl2:disjointObjectProperty should be used rather than owl2:disjointObjectProperties as now (just for consistency). Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#equivalentProperty-def -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 13:38:45 UTC