public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2008

• RE: Names for top and bottom properties Michel_Dumontier
• Re: On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec. Markus Krötzsch
• On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec. Achille Fokoue
• Re: Question about the topProperty Markus Krötzsch
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Bijan Parsia
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Ian Horrocks
• Re: Question about the topProperty Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Diego Calvanese
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Markus Krötzsch
• RE: Names for top and bottom properties Conrad Bock
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Michael Smith
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Uli Sattler
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Carsten Lutz
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Rinke Hoekstra

Tuesday, 29 April 2008

• RE: ISSUE-122: Proposal to accept and resolve Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Michael Schneider
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Sandro Hawke
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Bijan Parsia
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Alan Ruttenberg
• timeline on ACTION-135 review rif-rdf-owl Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys Ian Horrocks
• enitty annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys Alan Ruttenberg
• Agenda Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• ISSUE-122: Proposal to accept and resolve Ian Horrocks

Monday, 28 April 2008

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Alan Wu
• I managed to update the documents according to the resolution of issues at the 2F2F Boris Motik
• [public-owl-wg] <none> Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Bijan Parsia
• Scribing for teleconfs Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Bijan Parsia
• [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Kendall Grant Clark
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties Deborah L. McGuinness
• Names for top and bottom properties Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-85: Optional restrictions Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys Jeremy Carroll
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposal to resolve issue-107 deprecate OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 27 April 2008

• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Michael Schneider
• Proposal to resolve issue-107 deprecate OWL Lite Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 25 April 2008

• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? Michael Schneider
• Re: [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday's telecon Evan Wallace
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property Bijan Parsia
• [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday's telecon Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property Bijan Parsia
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property Rinke Hoekstra
• feedback on Easy keys and universal property Alan Wu
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-82 Ian Horrocks
• implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki Michael Schneider
• GRDDL non-action Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Question about the topProperty Carsten Lutz

Thursday, 24 April 2008

• Question about the topProperty Michael Schneider
• Action-141 non-xslt trick for GRDDL Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

• Re: lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Markus Krötzsch
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Bijan Parsia
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Carsten Lutz
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Markus Krötzsch
• [TF:Edu] First education document Bijan Parsia
• New OWLED Wiki Bijan Parsia
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Bijan Parsia
• RE: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Boris Motik
• RE: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Michael Schneider
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Bijan Parsia
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Bijan Parsia
• RE: Disposition of some recently raised issues Michael Schneider
• Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] Michael Schneider
• Disposition of some recently raised issues Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• Re: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec Michael Schneider
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Sandro Hawke
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• RE: OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 Michael Schneider
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 Jeremy Carroll
• OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Uli Sattler
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• Withdrawl ISSUE-117 Jeremy Carroll
• Proposal to close Issue 63 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to close Issue 80 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider
• Proposal to close Issue 80 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Ivan Herman
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Alan Wu

Monday, 21 April 2008

• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Bijan Parsia
• General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues Bijan Parsia
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Raised but not yet accepted issues Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions Michael Schneider
• Raised but not yet accepted issues Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions Michael Schneider
• F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? Sandro Hawke
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-122 (QCR RDF syntax): the "Expanding" RDF syntax for QCRs will damage OWL 2 Full OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 20 April 2008

• ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-118 (bNode semantics): Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential or skolem semantics? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider

Saturday, 19 April 2008

• Re: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 18 April 2008

• [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Conrad Bock
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml Michael Schneider
• RE: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Michael Schneider
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 17 April 2008

• URGENT Survey on OWL F2F3 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents Jeremy Carroll
• (interesting) history for ISSUE-111 mimetype Jeremy Carroll
• on issue-113 OWL-R non-entailments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109: namespaces for owl2 rdf/xml and xml/owl Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 16 April 2008

• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Boris Motik
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Bijan Parsia
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Conrad Bock
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Conrad Bock
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Elisa F. Kendall
• Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109: namespaces for owl2 rdf/xml and xml/owl Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-117 (solipsism): RAISED: ditch comprehension principles OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Minutes for review (last Wed) Jeremy Carroll
• pending review actions Jeremy Carroll
• RE: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Michael Schneider
• Driving while EL++ (or high on DL Lite, or under the influence of OWL-R) Bijan Parsia
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 April 2008

• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Alan Wu
• comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? Ivan Herman
• OWL WG agenda Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer Alan Wu

Monday, 14 April 2008

• I would like to start implementing the schanges to the OWL spec tomorrow Boris Motik
• Proposal to close Issue-9 and Issue-60 Ian Horrocks
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST Elisa F. Kendall

Sunday, 13 April 2008

• Easy Keys update Bijan Parsia
• RE: First crack at profiles in primer Michael Schneider
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer Bijan Parsia
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (another comment) Bijan Parsia
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer Bijan Parsia

Saturday, 12 April 2008

• Re: First crack at profiles in primer Ivan Herman
• Proposed: Close ISSUE-76, ISSUE-77, and ISSUE-80 Bijan Parsia
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (another comment) Ivan Herman
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer Ivan Herman

Friday, 11 April 2008

• publications done Sandro Hawke
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST Evan Wallace
• UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
• First crack at profiles in primer Bijan Parsia
• F2F2 Registration Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Receipt for Dinner for OWLED Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 10 April 2008

• Re: owl xml serialization (example doesn't work) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• owl xml serialization (example doesn't work) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Profiles intro Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Ian Horrocks
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Alan Wu
• OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• RE: Profiles intro Michael Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Deborah L. McGuinness

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Alan Wu
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Profiles intro Alan Wu
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• RE: Profiles intro Michael Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• new snapshots Sandro Hawke
• W3C/MIT offer to host F2F3 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Alan Wu
• Review of EL++ section (ACTION-118) Bijan Parsia
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-116 (axiomatictriples): Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-116 (axiomatictriples): Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Primer and Profiles checked Bijan Parsia
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Michael Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Ivan Herman
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Michael Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Ivan Herman
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Michael Schneider
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• RE: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL Michael Schneider
• Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman
• Re: Profiles intro Carsten Lutz
• Re: Profiles intro Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

• Primer next steps Bijan Parsia
• Profiles intro Bijan Parsia
• Re: Profiles document Jie Bao
• Agenda for TC Wed 2008-04-09 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Ivan Herman
• RE: roll call from F2F2 Michael Schneider
• [meta] Re: missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? Bijan Parsia
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: roll call from F2F2 Sandro Hawke
• roll call from F2F2 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• F2F3 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages Uli Sattler
• Re: missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? Alan Wu
• missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? Ivan Herman
• Profiles document Carsten Lutz
• Re: Small mistype in the OWL-R Full rules (withdrawn...) Ivan Herman
• Small mistype in the OWL-R Full rules Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• questionable links on all Wiki pages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• schneider paradox Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: references to OWL 2 Syntax Michael Schneider
• RE: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-113 (OWL-R nonentailments): Some OWL-R nonentailments are OWL-Full entailments Michael Schneider
• Re: publication progress Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: references to OWL 2 Syntax Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 7 April 2008

• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Sandro Hawke
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-114 (general punning): Which combinations of punning should be allowed? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: references to OWL 2 Syntax Michael Schneider
• links between documents (was Re: revised publication schedule) Sandro Hawke
• Re: revised publication schedule Bijan Parsia
• Re: revised publication schedule Bijan Parsia
• revised publication schedule Sandro Hawke
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Bijan Parsia
• links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix Sandro Hawke
• Re: Query for import task force Alan Ruttenberg
• references to OWL 2 Syntax Sandro Hawke
• Re: publication progress Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Query for import task force Bijan Parsia
• Re: publication progress Bijan Parsia
• Re: Query for import task force Bijan Parsia
• Re: publication progress Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Query for import task force Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: publication progress Bijan Parsia
• Re: Query for import task force Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: publication progress Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: publication progress Bijan Parsia
• Re: small misspell in the profile document Jeremy Carroll
• TR-formatted versions Sandro Hawke
• Re: small misspell in the profile document Ivan Herman
• RE: small misspell in the profile document Michael Schneider
• small misspell in the profile document Ivan Herman
• Re: publication progress Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: publication progress Jeremy Carroll
• publication progress Sandro Hawke
• Teleconference Wed, April 9, 2008 Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 6 April 2008

• RE: f2f2 minutes - day 1 ready Michael Schneider
• Presentation on OWL 2 Full at F2F2 Michael Schneider
• Query for import task force Bijan Parsia
• Re: [Fwd: Comment on OWL 1.1] (came to webont-comment list, forwarding for archiving) Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 5 April 2008

• bug fix in reverse RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• bug fix in reverse RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 4 April 2008

• F2F2 minutes Sandro Hawke
• ISSUE-113 (OWL-R nonentailments): Some OWL-R nonentailments are OWL-Full entailments OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-112 (Universal property): Universal property (a.k.a. universal role) missing in current OWL2 documents OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• FW: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL [RE: ACTION-102: The situation of deprecation in OWL-1.0-DL and OWL-1.0-Full] Michael Schneider
• Re: dc:creator use case Ivan Herman
• dc:creator use case Alan Ruttenberg
• The proposal for solving the RDF mapping issues Boris Motik
• [Fwd: Comment on OWL 1.1] (came to webont-comment list, forwarding for archiving) Ivan Herman
• Imports/Versioning proposal Alan Ruttenberg
• f2f2 minutes - day 1 ready Sandro Hawke
• A proposal for reintroducing deprecations into OWL 2 and thus addressing ISSUE-90 Boris Motik

Thursday, 3 April 2008

• ISSUE-111 (userintentsignaling): There's no way to signal the intended semantics of an OWL document OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• OWL2 Logo Rinke Hoekstra
• ISSUE-110 (CURIE vs. QName): Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• HP comments on OWL-R Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-108 (profilenames): Need to name the OWL Profiles OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 2 April 2008

• new snapshots Sandro Hawke
• Re: the term "fragments" Evan Wallace
• Re: the term "fragments" Ivan Herman
• the term "fragments" Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 1 April 2008

• Review XML & Primer Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: [Cancelled Event] UFDTF TC @ Mon Mar 31 10am - 11am () Deborah L. McGuinness

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:41:19 UTC