public-html@w3.org from August 2008 by date

Sunday, 31 August 2008

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Anne van Kesteren
• Editors (was Re: @headers issue resolved...) Laura Carlson
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Henri Sivonen
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Henri Sivonen
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Julian Reschke
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Henri Sivonen
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Laura Carlson
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Henri Sivonen
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Steven Faulkner
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. James Graham
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Philip Taylor
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. James Graham
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Robert J Burns
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. James Graham
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Robert J Burns
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Robert J Burns
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Smylers
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Robert J Burns
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Robert J Burns
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTML5 spec. Steven Faulkner

Saturday, 30 August 2008

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea?[1] Robert J Burns
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? Lachlan Hunt
• Are new void elements really a good idea? Julian Reschke
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Ben Millard
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Henri Sivonen
• Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Henri Sivonen

Friday, 29 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Julian Reschke
• Re: Postscript is not scriptable? (2.7.4 Content-Type sniffing) Ian Hickson
• Postscript is not scriptable? (2.7.4 Content-Type sniffing) Dan Connolly
• Re: About video & audio elements Dave Singer
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Smylers
• RE: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Chris Wilson
• RE: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? Phillips, Addison
• Re: About video & audio elements Nicolas LE GALL
• Re: About video & audio elements Maurice
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Joshue O Connor
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Joshue O Connor
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Robert J Burns
• RE: <bb> - typo, rename? Justin James
• Re: About video & audio elements Nicolas LE GALL
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Steven Faulkner
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Gez Lemon
• Re: Adjusting MathML attributes: definitionURL Ian Hickson
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. James Graham
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Henri Sivonen
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Nicolas LE GALL
• @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Henri Sivonen
• Re: The alt="" attribute Simon Pieters
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Simon Pieters
• Re: namespace-well-formedness and setting innerHTML in XML Ian Hickson
• Re: Prefixes and setting innerHTML in XML Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Jirka Kosek
• Re: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Tree construction: Coalescing text nodes Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Jirka Kosek
• Re: Quotes in attribute names after a boolean attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Parsing: Equals sign in unquoted attributes Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities David Carlisle
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Jirka Kosek
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 28 August 2008

• Re: Status of <a> Ian Hickson
• Re: About video & audio elements Maurice
• Re: on getting meta-data from images etc. Anne van Kesteren
• on getting meta-data from images etc. Dave Singer
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Ian Hickson
• Re: Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' Maurice
• Re: The alt="" attribute Robert J Burns
• Status of <a> Maurice
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Philip Taylor
• <bb> - typo, rename? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Mandatory and Important Al Gilman
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Jirka Kosek
• Re: The alt="" attribute Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart David Carlisle
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Robert J Burns
• [Bug 5997] New: Define script execution for XHTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal Doug Schepers
• Using usemap for purposes other than image maps, and related questions Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Henri Sivonen
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Lachlan Hunt
• Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: EXIF metadata Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Karl Dubost
• Re: EXIF metadata Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: meta content-language Felix Sasaki
• Re: EXIF metadata Lachlan Hunt
• Re: EXIF metadata Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

• Re: EXIF metadata (was: The alt="" attribute) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The alt="" attribute Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The alt="" attribute Lachlan Hunt
• RE: table headers - clear description of problem John Foliot
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Robert J Burns
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Sam Ruby
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Robert J Burns
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Kornel Lesinski
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• Re: The alt="" attribute Robert J Burns
• RE: meta content-language Justin James
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Robert J Burns
• RE: Workers Justin James
• RE: meta content-language CE Whitehead
• The alt="" attribute T.V Raman
• Re: test cases Re: xml:lang="" and lang="" Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Steven Faulkner
• Re: Workers Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
• RE: Workers Ian Hickson
• language declaration stats (was Re: meta content-language) Richard Ishida
• Re: The alt="" attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Julian Reschke
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Robert J Burns
• Re: meta content-language Erik van der Poel
• Re: meta content-language Martin Duerst
• RE: meta content-language Martin Duerst
• Re: The alt="" attribute Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: The alt="" attribute Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: The alt="" attribute Karl Dubost
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Matt Morgan-May

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: The alt="" attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• RE: The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Ian Hickson
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Thomas Broyer
• Re: The alt="" attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Validating XHTML5 with XML entities Jeff Schiller
• Re: The alt="" attribute Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 5994] New: add note in syntax section bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: The alt="" attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• RE: The alt="" attribute John Foliot
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Robert J Burns
• Re: The alt="" attribute Matt Morgan-May
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Al Gilman
• RE: The alt="" attribute Justin James
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Maurice
• Re: The alt="" attribute Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator olivier Thereaux
• RE: meta content-language CE Whitehead
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Gez Lemon
• RE: table headers - clear description of problem Sailesh Panchang
• Re: The alt="" attribute Karl Groves
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Henri Sivonen
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Laura Carlson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Karl Groves
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem David Poehlman
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Dan Connolly
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Dan Connolly
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem David Poehlman
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Laura Carlson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Robert J Burns
• Re: The alt="" attribute Steven Faulkner
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator Jens Meiert
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Julian Reschke
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Julian Reschke
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Steven Faulkner
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• The alt="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Steven Faulkner
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Laura Carlson
• [Bug 5991] New: workers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5990] New: SVG in HTML bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5989] New: alt="" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator olivier Thereaux
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Erik van der Poel

Monday, 25 August 2008

• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator Sam Ruby
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator Schalk Neethling
• HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator olivier Thereaux
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Justin James
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' William Loughborough
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> James Graham
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Robert J Burns
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Dave Singer
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Mandatory and Important Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Sam Kuper
• RE: Mandatory and Important John Foliot
• Re: meta content-language Mark Davis
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Ben Boyle
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Edward O'Connor
• Re: About video & audio elements Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Robert J Burns
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Ben Boyle
• Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Justin James
• RE: table headers - clear description of problem Sailesh Panchang
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem William Loughborough
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Robert J Burns
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Philip TAYLOR
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Steven Faulkner
• Re: About video & audio elements Henri Sivonen
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' David Poehlman
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Ian Hickson
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Robert J Burns
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' David Poehlman
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Steven Faulkner
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Laura Carlson
• Re: About video & audio elements Ian Hickson
• About video & audio elements Nicolas LE GALL
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML5 and XML Anne van Kesteren
• table headers - clear description of problem Steven Faulkner
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Steven Faulkner
• Re: meta content-language Martin Duerst
• HTML5 and XML (was: Re: meta content-language) Martin Duerst
• Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Doug Schepers

Sunday, 24 August 2008

• Re: Mandatory and Important Karl Dubost
• Re: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Laura Carlson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Laura Carlson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Robert J Burns
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Laura Carlson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Gez Lemon
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers William Loughborough
• RE: Mandatory and Important John Foliot
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Mandatory and Important Laura Carlson
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Laura Carlson
• Re: Flickr and alt William Loughborough
• RE: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) John Foliot
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requiring the alt attribute Robert J Burns
• requiring the alt attribute [was Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification] Robert J Burns
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal Ian Hickson

Saturday, 23 August 2008

• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Robert J Burns
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Gez Lemon
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Gez Lemon
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: Mandatory and Important Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important James Graham
• Re: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important Henri Sivonen
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification David Poehlman
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' David Poehlman
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) David Poehlman
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Julian Reschke
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Julian Reschke
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' Ian Hickson
• Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification Ian Hickson
• Re: Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' Ian Hickson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Steven Faulkner
• Re: Mandatory and Important Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Mandatory and Important Ian Hickson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important Laura Carlson
• Re: Mandatory and Important Laura Carlson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Laura Carlson
• Re: Flickr and alt Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 22 August 2008

• Re: Mandatory and Important Karl Dubost
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Robert J Burns
• embedded media norms and two separate text equivalents: alt text and descriptive text Robert J Burns
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) Ian Hickson
• Re: Mandatory and Important David Poehlman
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage David Poehlman
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Ian Hickson
• Re: Mandatory and Important Doug Schepers
• Re: Mandatory and Important Al Gilman
• Re: Mandatory and Important Robert J Burns
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Steven Faulkner
• Re: Mandatory and Important Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: some reflections on @alt usage Ian Hickson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Ian Hickson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Steven Faulkner
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage David Poehlman
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Julian Reschke
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Mark Davis
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Al Gilman
• Re: Mandatory and Important David Poehlman
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: Mandatory and Important Robert J Burns
• embedded media norms Robert J Burns
• Re: Mandatory and Important David Poehlman
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Julian Reschke
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• RE: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... Phillips, Addison
• Re: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... Dan Connolly
• Re: Mandatory and Important Robert J Burns
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Al Gilman
• Re: meta content-language Julian Reschke
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: meta content-language Julian Reschke
• Re: meta content-language Anne van Kesteren
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important David Poehlman
• Re: meta content-language Mark Davis
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Gez Lemon
• Re: Mandatory and Important David Poehlman
• RE: [LIKELY JUNK]Insight into the assumption that informs the HTML5 editors thinking on what constitutes an appropriate text alternative Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Insight into the assumption that informs the HTML5 editors thinking on what constitutes an appropriate text alternative Steven Faulkner
• Re: Mandatory and Important Robert J Burns
• Re: meta content-language Robert J Burns
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Re: meta content-language Martin Duerst
• Re: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... Julian Reschke
• Re: Interactiveness of <details> Ian Hickson
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.1 The details element Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Julian Reschke
• Re: meta content-language Felix Sasaki
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: meta content-language Felix Sasaki
• Re: meta content-language Martin Duerst
• Re: Mandatory and Important Matt Morgan-May
• Re: Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) Laura Carlson
• RE: Mandatory and Important Justin James
• Re: Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) William Loughborough
• Re: html5 nitpicks Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Gez Lemon
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 21 August 2008

• Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) Laura Carlson
• Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Robert J Burns
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models Ian Hickson
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: meta content-language Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Mandatory and Important Boris Zbarsky
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Mandatory and Important Matt Morgan-May
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Joshue O Connor
• Re: meta content-language Roy T. Fielding
• HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... Phillips, Addison
• RE: meta content-language Phillips, Addison
• RE: Mandatory and Important Justin James
• Re: meta content-language Henri Sivonen
• Re: meta content-language Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers James Graham
• Re: Mandatory and Important Matt Morgan-May
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Ian Hickson
• Deliverable for Action 72 @headers Laura Carlson
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage Al Gilman
• [Bug 5979] New: unclear whether new Audio(url) should throw bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Mandatory and Important Al Gilman
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Ben Boyle
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Ben Millard
• RE: Mandatory and Important Justin James
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Karl Groves
• Re: Mandatory and Important James Graham
• RE: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Mandatory and Important Dave Singer
• Mandatory and Important Laura Carlson
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data David Poehlman
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Ian Hickson
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Henri Sivonen
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Flickr and alt Justin James
• Optional But Important (was: alt attribute - a very simple proposal) Doug Schepers
• test cases Re: xml:lang="" and lang="" Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 20 August 2008

• Re: Flickr and alt SirPavlova
• Re: Flickr and alt SirPavlova

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt Jonathan Harriot

Thursday, 21 August 2008

• xml:lang="" and lang="" Ian Hickson
• RE: meta content-language Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 20 August 2008

• Re: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Flickr and alt Joshue O Connor
• Re: Flickr and alt Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: Flickr and alt Robert J Burns
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Joshue O Connor
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Smylers
• Re: Flickr and alt Henri Sivonen
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• RE: Flickr and alt Justin James
• Re: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: meta content-language John Cowan
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: Flickr and alt Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Flickr and alt Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• Re: isContentEditable: boolean Ian Hickson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Patrick H. Lauke
• removeformat feedback Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages about contentEditable, text selection, and related subjects Ian Hickson
• Re: Event listeners and designMode (was: Re: several messages about contentEditable, ...) Ian Hickson
• RE: Flickr and alt John Foliot
• RE: Flickr and alt Justin James
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Joshue O Connor
• Re: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Fwd: Flickr and alt Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Justin James
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• RE: meta content-language Phillips, Addison
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: Flickr and alt Henri Sivonen
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Smylers
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: Flickr and alt Smylers
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Philip TAYLOR
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal Laura Carlson
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Flickr and alt Smylers
• Re: Flickr and alt Joshue O Connor
• Re: Flickr and alt Smylers
• Re: Flickr and alt Smylers
• Re: Flickr and alt Henri Sivonen
• Re: Flickr and alt Joshue O Connor
• Re: Flickr and alt Smylers
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Dealing with conflict in lang and xml:lang Anne van Kesteren
• Dealing with conflict in lang and xml:lang Richard Ishida
• Re: Flickr and alt Dan Brickley
• Re: Flickr and alt Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Flickr and alt Robert J Burns
• Re: Flickr and alt Gez Lemon
• Re: [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive Toby A Inkster
• Re: Flickr and alt Tomas Caspers
• alt attribute - a very simple proposal Karl Dubost
• Comparing Websites against a Checklist (Research) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: targeting August for next working draft of HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Flickr and alt John Foliot
• Re: Flickr and alt Gez Lemon
• RE: Flickr and alt John Foliot
• RE: meta content-language Andrew Cunningham
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper

Monday, 18 August 2008

• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Fwd: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Flickr and alt Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• Re: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt Laura Carlson
• Fwd: Flickr and alt Sam Kuper
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Eric Eggert
• Re: Flickr and alt Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Flickr and alt Jon Barnett
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) Justin James
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Flickr and alt Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Flickr and alt David Poehlman
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Steven Faulkner
• Re: Flickr and alt Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' James Graham
• Re: Flickr and alt Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Ory Segal
• Re: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) David Poehlman
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Boris Zbarsky
• Collections of Interesting Web Pages (Research) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) Anne van Kesteren
• Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' Steven Faulkner
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' Steven Faulkner
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' Steven Faulkner
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Ory Segal
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Boris Zbarsky
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Boris Zbarsky

Sunday, 17 August 2008

• Re: Content-Type sniffing: unknown type mask including 00 at end Ian Hickson
• Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification Laura Carlson
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested David Poehlman
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested David Poehlman
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) David Woolley
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested Steven Faulkner

Saturday, 16 August 2008

• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested James Graham
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested Steven Faulkner
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested James Graham
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested Steven Faulkner
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested James Graham
• Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' Steven Faulkner
• HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested Steven Faulkner
• Re: meta content-language Julian Reschke
• RE: Images and alternative text Justin James
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: meta content-language Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 15 August 2008

• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 10 August 2008

• Content-Type sniffing: unknown type mask including 00 at end Geoffrey Sneddon
• The datagrid element's categories Geoffrey Sneddon

Friday, 15 August 2008

• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• RE: meta content-language Phillips, Addison
• Re: meta content-language Mark Davis
• RE: meta content-language Phillips, Addison
• HTML Audio typo Jeff Schiller
• Re: meta content-language Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 14 August 2008

• DOM traversal ambiguity question Ory Segal

Friday, 15 August 2008

• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 14 August 2008

• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
• RE: meta content-language Phillips, Addison
• RE: meta content-language Richard Ishida
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Christian Schmidt
• [Bug 5964] New: getting width/height on <embed>, <iframe>, <object> and <video> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5963] New: Editorial: xrefs in media event summary table bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
• AUTO: Aaron M Leventhal is out of the office. (returning 08/20/2008) Aaron M Leventhal
• ISSUE-58 (curly alt): Use of "curly brackets" to identify a graphical image by its use or type by inserting a generic identifier / descriptor in curly braces as the @alt value for an IMG, [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: document.location and no Window Ian Hickson
• Re: Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName Ian Hickson
• Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Ian Hickson
• Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance Ian Hickson
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies Ian Hickson
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance Julian Reschke
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Boris Zbarsky
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies Simon Pieters
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance Ian Hickson
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies Ian Hickson
• Re: meta content-language Ian Hickson
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Philip TAYLOR
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Effect of bogus lang on determining natural language Ian Hickson
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Philip TAYLOR
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Garrett Smith
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Justin James
• Re: Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: alt curly braces proposal in the editor's HTML5 draft Leif Halvard Silli

Monday, 11 August 2008

• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: Images and alternative text Robert J Burns
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Justin James
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Boris Zbarsky
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• alt curly braces proposal in the editor's HTML5 draft Laura Carlson
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Justin James
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Philip TAYLOR
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Toby A Inkster
• Re: Images and alternative text Robert J Burns
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing Ian Hickson
• Re: Images and alternative text Jon Barnett
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky

Sunday, 10 August 2008

• [Bug 5946] New: execCommand('insertHTML') should throw in xml bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Images and alternative text James Graham
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Images and alternative text Smylers
• Re: Images and alternative text Smylers
• RE: Workers Justin James
• RE: Images and alternative text Justin James

Saturday, 9 August 2008

• [Bug 5944] New: Unclear wording, section 8.2.3.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Images and alternative text Smylers

Friday, 8 August 2008

• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Images and alternative text Dave Singer
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip Taylor
• RE: Images and alternative text Justin James
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip Taylor
• Re: Images and alternative text Dave Singer
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text T.V Raman
• Re: Images and alternative text T.V Raman
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Images and alternative text Justin James
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip Taylor
• Re: Images and alternative text James Graham

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• Re: Images and alternative text John C. Vernaleo

Friday, 8 August 2008

• RE: Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• Re: Images and alternative text James Graham
• Re: Images and alternative text Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Images and alternative text Ian Hickson
• Re: Images and alternative text Philip Taylor
• [Bug 5941] New: <video>.width/height should have default values defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Is it time for eRDF 1.1? Henri Sivonen
• RE: GRDDL Justin James
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• RE: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Justin James
• [Bug 5937] New: make cache manifest syntax more extensible bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5936] New: Offline cache syntax section needs an example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 6 August 2008

• Re: GRDDL Tom Morris
• RE: DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? Justin James
• Re: DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? Thomas Broyer
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: GRDDL Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies James Graham
• Re: question about the draft: Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies Sam Ruby
• DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? Jeff Schiller
• Re: question about the draft: Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data Al Gilman
• RE: question about the draft: T.V Raman
• Re: question about the draft: T.V Raman
• Re: Extensibility strategies Henri Sivonen
• Re: GRDDL (and the rule of least power) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies Sam Ruby
• Re: GRDDL (and the rule of least power) Dan Connolly
• [Bug 5933] New: <video muted> issues bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: GRDDL Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies Sam Ruby
• Re: GRDDL Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: GRDDL Julian Reschke
• Re: GRDDL Henri Sivonen
• Re: GRDDL Julian Reschke
• Re: GRDDL Henri Sivonen
• Re: GRDDL Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Speed of specs (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Karl Dubost
• Speed of specs (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Justin James
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Karl Dubost
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• RE: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Justin James
• Re: Determining Script Type Jim Jewett

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

• Re: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Toby A Inkster
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements Ian Hickson
• Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> Simon Pieters
• Re: Interactiveness of <video controls> and <audio controls> Ian Hickson
• Re: Please clarify that type=text/javascript is optional Ian Hickson
• Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> Ian Hickson
• Re: The script language attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Determining Script Type Ian Hickson
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Ian Hickson
• GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) Justin James
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 Richard Ishida
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style Jens Meiert
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Toby Inkster
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style Boris Zbarsky
• RE: question about the draft: Justin James
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• Re: Canvas miscellaneous comments Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: question about the draft: David Poehlman
• Re: Extensibility strategies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies Sam Ruby
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: question about the draft: Smylers
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies Henri Sivonen
• Re: Canvas line style comments Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: question about the draft: Smylers
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style Jens Meiert
• Re: question about the draft: Robert J Burns
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: question about the draft: Justin James
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: question about the draft: Ian Hickson
• Re: question about the draft: Smylers
• RE: question about the draft: Brian Smith
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• RE: question about the draft: Justin James
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Karl Dubost
• Re: question about the draft: Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson

Monday, 4 August 2008

• [Bug 5927] New: HTMLInputElement need some improvements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Chris Wilson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: question about the draft: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
• Re: question about the draft: Ian Hickson
• Re: question about the draft: David Poehlman
• Re: question about the draft: David Poehlman
• Re: question about the draft: Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• question about the draft: David Poehlman
• alt image replacement and replacement style Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section Dave Singer
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Images and alternative text Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Henri Sivonen
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Julian Reschke
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Boris Zbarsky
• What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Boris Zbarsky
• HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section Lachlan Hunt
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Laura Carlson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Felix Sasaki
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Karl Dubost
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson

Sunday, 3 August 2008

• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 James Graham
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 David Muschiol
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Felix Sasaki
• RE: Pseudo-namespaces Justin James

Saturday, 2 August 2008

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Doug Schepers
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 David Muschiol
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 David Muschiol
• Re: Pseudo-namespaces Julian Reschke
• Pseudo-namespaces (was: RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)) Justin James
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: Extensibility strategies Ian Hickson
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James

Friday, 1 August 2008

• Re: Image intrinsic aspect ratio and replaced element box aspect ratio Ian Hickson
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Jeff Schiller
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Chris Wilson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Jeff Schiller
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Dan Connolly
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Felix Sasaki
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Dan Connolly
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Edward O'Connor
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Justin James
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Karl Dubost
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Chris Wilson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) James Graham
• FW: Content Transformation Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft Chris Wilson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) James Graham
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Image intrinsic aspect ratio and replaced element box aspect ratio Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Julian Reschke
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Laura Carlson
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Toby A Inkster
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Simon Pieters
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Simon Pieters
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Felix Sasaki
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Felix Sasaki
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Dave Singer
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 Karl Dubost
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) Laura Carlson

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2008 22:52:53 UTC