- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:30:42 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 16:45, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > > Or should "transparent" be read to imply that <style scoped> isn't allowed > > there? (If that's the case, there are <ins>/<del> repercussions, too. Sigh.) > > It might be sensible not to define <style scoped> as being itself prose > content. This would mean that <style scoped> (like individual list items > or table cells) couldn't be marked up as inserted/deleted which would > reduce the complexity of ins/del. I hesitate to do this because I don't want people to end up just wrapping <style> elements in <div>s or <span>s to sneak them into <ins> or <del>. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 23:31:06 UTC