- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:48:58 -0400
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > You are right: Edward O'Connor is wrong. <video>/<audio> directly rule > out (mis)using its fallback capabilities for fallback: > > " User agents should not show this content to the user; it is intended > for older Web browsers which do not support video, so that legacy video > plugins can be tried, or to show text to the users of these older > browser informing them of how to access the video contents." So if the UA doesn't support the particular codec but does support <video> it should not show the fallback content? -Boris
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 17:50:25 UTC