- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:45:07 -0700
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On Aug 21, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > So is it your view that not only the HTML 5 draft, but even the > HTML 4 spec is wrong on this as well? > > From HTML 4, Section 8.1.2, Inheritance of language codes: > > An element inherits language code information according > to the following order of precedence (highest to lowest): > * The lang attribute set for the element itself. > * The closest parent element that has the lang attribute > set (i.e., the lang attribute is inherited). > * The HTTP "Content-Language" header (which may be > configured in a server). For example: > Content-Language: en-cockney > * User agent default values and user preferences. FTR, I don't see anything wrong with using the languages in Content-Language as a last-gap alternative to the default when no other in-content language processing information is present. However, that is quite different from changing the meaning of content-language to be about language processing. I.e., making a correlation between the two for default processing is reasonable because it is more likely to result in the correct language being chosen than it would to ignore the metadata entirely. That does not make it a replacement for lang or xml:lang. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 22:45:44 UTC