Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? from Robert J Burns on 2008-08-31 (public-html@w3.org from August 2008)

From: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:03:09 +0300
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9DCFC06F-8BCB-44A5-B3DA-37BB3576CF4D@robburns.com>

 
On Aug 31, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Robert J Burns wrote:

> Sufficient for what? As part of a serialized document that needs to  
> be processed  by a UA that does not know what an eventsource element  
> is, it is not sufficient. Should it produce a DOM
>
> html
>  eventsource
>     nextelement
>
> or
>
> html
>   eventsource
>   nextelement
>
> where next  element can even be a known element.

Correction, I meant to write:

html
  ...
    ⋮
         eventsource
             nextelement

or

html
  ...
    ⋮
         eventsource
         nextelement

I hope that's avoids confusion.

Take care,
Rob

Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 09:03:50 UTC