Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> [[ ***DHSPAM*** ??? ]]?

Sorry, my spam filter is being over-eager with some public-html posts 
recently and I sometimes forget to edit the subject line.


> Suffice it to say that I now see some potential promise for the proposal 
> that you have outlined. I'm not yet convinced that it is usable enough 
> for people to actually consider trying it, but if it does end up getting 
> documented and used (which may involve tweaking the proposal), I can see 
> it as the basis for closing issue 41..

Ok... What changes would the spec need to get us there?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 20:02:07 UTC