Re: Are new void elements really a good idea?

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:34:36 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>  On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:22:14 +0200, Julian Reschke  
>> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> On the other hand, what, except ideological reasons, stops us from  
>>> allowing
>>>
>>>   <tagname></tagname>
>>>
>>> as well?
>>  <br></br> "means" <br><br> due to legacy parsing.
>
> Does that apply to new elements as well?

No, but it would be confusing to allow a end tag only for a subset of the  
void elements. (Besides that, people will start trying to put stuff  
between the tags, of course.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 22:52:53 UTC