- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Doug Schepers wrote: > > It would very useful for us to know how you are prioritizing your > upcoming actions. Right now I'm just going based on the date of the e-mails, oldest e-mail first, skipping past certain issues that are of lower importance (like getting the references right). I will be working on Web Forms 2 integration relatively soon, which will take a while. I also prioritise folders with lots of pending input and deal with those occasionally. However, if there is something that should be dealt with quicker, drop me a mail and I'll be happy to change the order to accommodate your needs. > In particular, what is the timeframe for the various browser vendors to > seriously consider implementing this feature? We would like to be > responsive to these considerations, as far as we are able. I'm not sure what the current prioritisation of parser-level changes are in terms of the four major desktop browsers. If any of the vendors have any input here it would be quite helpful. I am aware of two implementations of the parser model currently commented out in the spec, though, at least one of which is being used in a number of places. > Resolving this matter is a major priority to the SVG WG, but we also > have other matters to resolve that may be more urgent, a conundrum that > I'm sure you appreciate. Indeed I do. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 11:30:50 UTC