- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:11:50 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 16:12:59 UTC
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote on 08/06/2008 06:50:36 AM: > > However, if an extension is meant to be potentially script-sensitive > without browser-native support being a prerequisite, DOM consistency > matters more across old browsers and new browsers, because neither old > nor new browsers have the browser-native support for the feature. > > Isn't it true that the <aside> element present in HTML5 produces > > different DOMs with existing shipped versions of Firefox, Safari, > > Opera, and IE? > > > Yes, for old enough values of existing. My weblog is one of the few that use this tag, and I would assert that a significant factor in that is that the current shipping versions of both IE and Firefox won't produce correct DOMs and/or can't style such elements correctly. With Firefox, this can be addressed by using XHTML. With IE, this can be addressed via JavaScript. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 16:12:59 UTC