- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:31:02 -0500
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com>, James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Sam and Justin, Sam wrote: > My opinion is that there one change that would make this process stronger > is if there were a clear escallation path for cases such as these. Justin wrote: > I joined this group in the hopes of having the chance to reverse the course > of HTML 5, which when I read the initial public draft, I was absolutely > appalled by. I would encourage you both to bring your concerns to a Teleconference [1] and try to get a Tracker issue [2] RAISED, OPENED and maybe an ACTION assigned to move it to the PENDINGREVIEW stage where you can suggest "a consensus action that requires WG and/or chair review; this may prompt the WG chairs to estimate the level of consensus and put a question to the WG in order to resolve the issue." [3] Best Regards, Laura [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Teleconferences [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#head-b1c997dd7648a369f4639d079c027d819abbecc4 [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#line-14 -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 11:31:39 UTC