- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:19:37 +0200
- To: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Edward O'Connor wrote: >> Could you clarify what extension points you're talking about? Class? > > Offhand, @class, @rel, @id, <div>, <span>, <meta>, @data-* all come to > mind. I suppose @role counts, though why you'd use @role instead of > @class eludes me. To put in RDF statements? How would you class for that? rel could work for this particular case (it would work better if there was a registry mechanism). div/span: don't see where there's extensibility in them. meta: yes. In fact, there's a spec that talks about how putting DC properties into meta elements (RFC 2731), embedding namespaces, but guess what, HTML5 breaks it by removing the scheme attribute. @data-* is only in HTML5, and the documentation makes it clear that it has a different purpose. That being said, it has the same problem as most of the other things you mentioned, the lack of a disambiguation mechanism. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 18:20:22 UTC