- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:28:06 -0400
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Philip Taylor \(Webmaster, Ret'd\)'" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Ian Hickson > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 8:32 PM > To: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) > Cc: public-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: question about the draft: > > > If this assertion is true, why do you need "an appropriate HTML > element" > > when you can create a nonce-element using the very techniques you > have > > proposed ? > > A "nonce-element" doesn't help screen readers. Screen readers only know > real HTML elements, they don't know about the inventions of the author. > Extensibility solutions don't help accessibility. They do, *if* we provide a mechanism to tie semantics/accessibility to the class. J.Ja
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 04:29:03 UTC