W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec]

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:41:49 +0200
Message-ID: <48B7C45D.6040504@gmx.de>
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, 2008-08-29 10:17 +0200:
>> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>> I'd be OK with <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "XSLT-compat">, since it reflects
>>> the problem it is solving--making the string resistant to bogus
>>> rationalizations about its purpose.
>> That's indeed way to go. As HTML5 is not an SGML application there is no
>> reason to stick to FPI syntax inside "public identifier". I think that
>> this proposal will accommodate all parties.
> A couple of questions/comments -
>   - Instead of "XSLT-compat" or some other arbitrary string, why
>     not just require (if we do decide we want to allow it
>     there at all) that it just be the empty string? XSLT engines
>     can output an empty value for it, and it seems to me that if
>     we have it all, we would want the value to be empty, not some
>     standard value that would become a de facto public ID and that
>     apps would lead to the same very real "bogus rationalizations
>     about its purpose" problem that Henri describes.
> ...

Good idea.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 09:43:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:37 UTC