- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:44:05 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 21 Aug 2008, at 4:37 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > Indeed; I didn't mean it in any way as a slight towards you, merely a > reminder that we have to base our decisions on the actual results of > research rather than our opinions. In the case of accessibility requirements, that oft-repeated 'have to' is overkill. It is a counter-productive over-reaching demand. I understand it is your personal preference, but in terms of what HTML WG expects from the WAI it is unacceptable. People with disabilities are a sparse enough population so that you have to forget everything you learned in statistics class and re-invent Bayesian inference with significant weight given to the input from individual consumers and particularly the trainers and rehabilitation engineers that work with a range of consumers and can offer some synthesis of a model of ergonomics for human-computer interaction. The WAI has been working on this for a long time. Listen up. Al
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 15:44:56 UTC