- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:42:28 -0500
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Karl, > I have been clear and precise in my initial message *entirely left to WCAG*. > The second draft proposal is doing the same mistake than the current text. I > said it here: > >>> The specification would then be lighter, could have a pointer saying all >>> the >>> requirements for accessibility are defined in wcag 2.0. Makes sense. > My proposal is something along: > > All img elements must have the alt content attribute set. > The accessibility requirements on the possible values of > the alt attributes are defined by WCAG 2.0 and not HTML 5. Perfect. Thank you! Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 12:43:05 UTC