Laura Carlson wrote on 08/01/2008 07:31:02 AM: > > Hi Sam and Justin, > > Sam wrote: > > > My opinion is that there one change that would make this process stronger > > is if there were a clear escallation path for cases such as these. > > Justin wrote: > > > I joined this group in the hopes of having the chance to reverse the course > > of HTML 5, which when I read the initial public draft, I was absolutely > > appalled by. > > I would encourage you both to bring your concerns to a Teleconference > [1] and try to get a Tracker issue [2] RAISED, OPENED and maybe an > ACTION assigned to move it to the PENDINGREVIEW stage where you can > suggest "a consensus action that requires WG and/or chair review; this > may prompt the WG chairs to estimate the level of consensus and put a > question to the WG in order to resolve the issue." [3] This is the issue: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41 > Best Regards, > Laura > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Teleconferences > [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#head-b1c997dd7648a369f4639d079c027d819abbecc4 > [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#line-14 > > -- > Laura L. Carlson - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 14:07:07 UTC