- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:34:22 +0200
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, "Justin James" <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:19:43 +0200, Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com> wrote: > This is because, for legacy reasons, <img> is an empty element, and so > its text equivalent lives in an attribute, whereas <audio> and <video> > both support rich fallback via their content. Actually, I think the idea is that the content stream itself is accessible. The contents of the <audio> and <video> element are a) for <source> elements and b) for user agents not supporting <audio> and <video>. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 15:35:12 UTC