- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:31:20 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > Those had the http or https URI scheme (a promiscuous > self-signing-accepting certificate handler was used for https), returned > text/html as Content-Type and 200 as the response status. > > So yes, this set did contain pseudo-XHTML. But note that HTML5 makes the > most common pseudo-XHTML talismans conforming and tree builder-level > doctype errors didn't count. Thanks, Henri : would it be possible (i.e., easy) to partition the statistics on the basis of DOCTYPE ? Philip TAYLOR
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2008 08:32:00 UTC