- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:46:50 +0200
- To: "Philip TAYLOR" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, "Justin James" <j_james@mindspring.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:40:43 +0200, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> Actually, I think the idea is that the content stream itself is >> accessible. > > That is not something that the HTML specification can > (or should) mandate. I don't think it does. >> The contents of the <audio> and <video> element are a) for <source> >> elements and b) for user agents not supporting <audio> and <video>. > > But if someone who were unable to hear audio, or > see video, were to configure his/her browser so > as not to render such streams, then such a configuration > would surely be indistinguishable from "user agents not > supporting <audio> and <video>", and thus the content > would be rendered, would it not ? I don't see why that would be true. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 15:48:01 UTC