public-html@w3.org from August 2008 by author

Aaron M Leventhal

• AUTO: Aaron M Leventhal is out of the office. (returning 08/20/2008) (Wednesday, 13 August)

Al Gilman

• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Wednesday, 6 August)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

• Re: Workers (Wednesday, 27 August)

Andrew Cunningham

• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Tuesday, 19 August)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: on getting meta-data from images etc. (Thursday, 28 August)
• <bb> - typo, rename? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: HTML5 and XML (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Dealing with conflict in lang and xml:lang (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) (Monday, 18 August)
• Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

• Comparing Websites against a Checklist (Research) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Collections of Interesting Web Pages (Research) (Monday, 18 August)

Ben Boyle

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)

Ben Millard

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Monday, 4 August)

Brian Smith

• RE: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5997] New: Define script execution for XHTML5 (Thursday, 28 August)
• [Bug 5994] New: add note in syntax section (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 5991] New: workers (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 5990] New: SVG in HTML (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 5989] New: alt="" (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 5979] New: unclear whether new Audio(url) should throw (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive (Tuesday, 19 August)
• [Bug 5964] New: getting width/height on <embed>, <iframe>, <object> and <video> (Wednesday, 13 August)
• [Bug 5963] New: Editorial: xrefs in media event summary table (Wednesday, 13 August)
• [Bug 5946] New: execCommand('insertHTML') should throw in xml (Sunday, 10 August)
• [Bug 5944] New: Unclear wording, section 8.2.3.1 (Saturday, 9 August)
• [Bug 5941] New: <video>.width/height should have default values defined (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5937] New: make cache manifest syntax more extensible (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5936] New: Offline cache syntax section needs an example (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5933] New: <video muted> issues (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 5927] New: HTMLInputElement need some improvements (Monday, 4 August)

CE Whitehead

• RE: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Tuesday, 26 August)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Wednesday, 6 August)

Chris Wilson

• RE: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• FW: Content Transformation Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 1 August)

Christian Schmidt

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 13 August)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

Dan Connolly

• Postscript is not scriptable? (2.7.4 Content-Type sniffing) (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: GRDDL (and the rule of least power) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Dave Singer

• Re: About video & audio elements (Friday, 29 August)
• on getting meta-data from images etc. (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

David Carlisle

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Thursday, 28 August)

David Muschiol

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Saturday, 2 August)

David Poehlman

• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)
• question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)

David Woolley

• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Sunday, 17 August)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal (Thursday, 28 August)
• Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Optional But Important (was: alt attribute - a very simple proposal) (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Saturday, 2 August)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Monday, 4 August)
• HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Monday, 4 August)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Eric Eggert

• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)

Erik van der Poel

• Re: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Tuesday, 26 August)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

Garrett Smith

• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 25 August)
• Content-Type sniffing: unknown type mask including 00 at end (Sunday, 10 August)
• The datagrid element's categories (Sunday, 10 August)

Gez Lemon

• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Is it time for eRDF 1.1? (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (and the rule of least power) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-58 (curly alt): Use of "curly brackets" to identify a graphical image by its use or type by inserting a generic identifier / descriptor in curly braces as the @alt value for an IMG, [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 13 August)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Postscript is not scriptable? (2.7.4 Content-Type sniffing) (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Adjusting MathML attributes: definitionURL (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: namespace-well-formedness and setting innerHTML in XML (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Prefixes and setting innerHTML in XML (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Tree construction: Coalescing text nodes (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Quotes in attribute names after a boolean attribute (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Parsing: Equals sign in unquoted attributes (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Status of <a> (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements (Thursday, 28 August)
• Using usemap for purposes other than image maps, and related questions (Thursday, 28 August)
• Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: Workers (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Interactiveness of <details> (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.1 The details element (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: html5 nitpicks (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages (Thursday, 21 August)
• xml:lang="" and lang="" (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: isContentEditable: boolean (Tuesday, 19 August)
• removeformat feedback (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: several messages about contentEditable, text selection, and related subjects (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Event listeners and designMode (was: Re: several messages about contentEditable, ...) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: targeting August for next working draft of HTML5 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Content-Type sniffing: unknown type mask including 00 at end (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: document.location and no Window (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Effect of bogus lang on determining natural language (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Copypaste error in vague date parsing algorithm (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• RE: Workers (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.3. The command and 3.18.4. the menu elements (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Interactiveness of <video controls> and <audio controls> (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Please clarify that type=text/javascript is optional (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: The script language attribute (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Determining Script Type (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Validation error frequencies in Alexa top 500 front pages (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Canvas miscellaneous comments (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Canvas line style comments (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: HTML5 object element - classid or not classid? (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Images and alternative text (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Image intrinsic aspect ratio and replaced element box aspect ratio (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

James Graham

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Tuesday, 26 August)
• HTML Audio typo (Friday, 15 August)
• DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Jens Meiert

• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: alt image replacement and replacement style (Tuesday, 5 August)

Jim Jewett

• Re: Determining Script Type (Wednesday, 6 August)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 28 August)

John C. Vernaleo

• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)

John Cowan

• Re: meta content-language (Wednesday, 20 August)

John Foliot

• RE: table headers - clear description of problem (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Mandatory and Important (Monday, 25 August)
• RE: Mandatory and Important (Sunday, 24 August)
• RE: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Sunday, 24 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

Jon Barnett

• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)

Jonathan Harriot

• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Saturday, 30 August)
• Are new void elements really a good idea? (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: Deprecated language tags and document conformance (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 4 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Pseudo-namespaces (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Justin James

• RE: <bb> - typo, rename? (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: Workers (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• RE: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• RE: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: Flickr and alt (was: Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested) (Monday, 18 August)
• RE: Images and alternative text (Saturday, 16 August)
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• RE: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• RE: Workers (Sunday, 10 August)
• RE: Images and alternative text (Sunday, 10 August)
• RE: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• RE: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• RE: GRDDL (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Speed of specs (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• RE: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: Pseudo-namespaces (Sunday, 3 August)
• Pseudo-namespaces (was: RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• RE: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• test cases Re: xml:lang="" and lang="" (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Speed of specs (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

Karl Groves

• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: EXIF metadata (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: EXIF metadata (was: The alt="" attribute) (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: test cases Re: xml:lang="" and lang="" (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Comments on the recent changes to the alt attribute section (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Image intrinsic aspect ratio and replaced element box aspect ratio (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

Laura Carlson

• Editors (was Re: @headers issue resolved...) (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) (Friday, 22 August)
• Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) (Thursday, 21 August)
• Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Thursday, 21 August)
• Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification (Sunday, 17 August)
• alt curly braces proposal in the editor's HTML5 draft (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: EXIF metadata (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: EXIF metadata (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: EXIF metadata (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Fwd: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: alt curly braces proposal in the editor's HTML5 draft (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Sunday, 3 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Flickr and alt (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Friday, 15 August)

Mark Davis

• Re: meta content-language (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)

Martin Duerst

• Re: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Monday, 25 August)
• HTML5 and XML (was: Re: meta content-language) (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Thursday, 21 August)

Maurice

• Re: About video & audio elements (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' (Thursday, 28 August)
• Status of <a> (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 26 August)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)

Nicolas LE GALL

• Re: About video & audio elements (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Friday, 29 August)
• About video & audio elements (Monday, 25 August)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• alt image replacement and replacement style (Monday, 4 August)

olivier Thereaux

• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Tuesday, 26 August)
• HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Monday, 25 August)

Ory Segal

• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Monday, 18 August)
• DOM traversal ambiguity question (Thursday, 14 August)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Fwd: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)

Philip Taylor

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)

• Re: question about the draft: (Monday, 4 August)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: [whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web? (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... (Friday, 22 August)
• HTML5 URL vs. IRI vs. URI... (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Thursday, 14 August)

Richard Ishida

• RE: meta content-language (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Wednesday, 27 August)
• language declaration stats (was Re: meta content-language) (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Dealing with conflict in lang and xml:lang (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Monday, 18 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Friday, 15 August)
• RE: meta content-language (Thursday, 14 August)
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Tuesday, 5 August)

Robert J Burns

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea?[1] (Saturday, 30 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: requiring the alt attribute (Sunday, 24 August)
• requiring the alt attribute [was Re: Another HTML5 alt conformance question for clarification] (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Friday, 22 August)
• embedded media norms and two separate text equivalents: alt text and descriptive text (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• embedded media norms (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Mandatory and Important (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 21 August)

Sailesh Panchang

• RE: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• RE: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• RE: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 21 August)

Sam Kuper

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)
• Fwd: Flickr and alt (Monday, 18 August)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Saturday, 2 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Friday, 1 August)

Schalk Neethling

• Re: HTML5 parser integrated in W3C Markup Validator (Monday, 25 August)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: [LIKELY JUNK]Insight into the assumption that informs the HTML5 editors thinking on what constitutes an appropriate text alternative (Friday, 22 August)

Simon Pieters

• Re: The alt="" attribute (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: xml:lang in the light of error frequencies (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

SirPavlova

• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Wednesday, 20 August)

Smylers

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Sunday, 10 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Saturday, 9 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Tuesday, 5 August)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 31 August)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: The alt="" attribute (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (and summary of research so far) (Saturday, 23 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Friday, 22 August)
• Insight into the assumption that informs the HTML5 editors thinking on what constitutes an appropriate text alternative (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 18 August)
• Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Monday, 18 August)
• Request for clarification of 'In many cases, the image is actually just supplementary' (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Sunday, 17 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)
• Re: HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)
• Clarification of case where 'there simply is no text that can do justice to an image' (Saturday, 16 August)
• HTML5 alt conformance criteria clarifications requested (Saturday, 16 August)

T.V Raman

• The alt="" attribute (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 8 August)
• RE: question about the draft: (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: question about the draft: (Wednesday, 6 August)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Validating XHTML5 with XML entities (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: DOMStringMap - get keys, et length? (Wednesday, 6 August)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: [Bug 5974] New: Language tag sameness should probably be ASCII case-insensitive (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: <script src=javascript:"..."> should do nothing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: GRDDL (was: RE: Extensibility strategies) (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Friday, 1 August)

Toby Inkster

• RE: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 5 August)

Tom Morris

• Re: GRDDL (Wednesday, 6 August)

Tomas Caspers

• Re: Flickr and alt (Tuesday, 19 August)

William Loughborough

• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: Request for clarification of the case where 'the image isn't discussed by the surrounding text, but it has some relevance' (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Flickr and alt (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: Alt Use Cases ACTION 54 (was Re: Mandatory and Important) (Friday, 22 August)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2008 22:52:53 UTC