- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:35:34 +0100
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > > So out of the whole set of documents, 0.36% weren't XMLNS-wellformed and > even less failed to parse in an non-NS-aware parser? > > That's a really small fraction, given the fact that I keep hearing "XML > has failed on the web" and "people do not understand namespaces". I think that that argument is actually true of (purported) XHMTL, but fails to acknowledge that both hand authors of SVG and SVG authoring tool writers are more technically aware. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Sunday, 17 August 2008 10:34:52 UTC