Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs from Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) on 2008-08-30 (public-html@w3.org from August 2008)

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:03:28 +0100
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <48B8FED0.2040208@Rhul.Ac.Uk>

Henri Sivonen wrote:
 >
 > Only text/html pages with
 > response code 200 were considered.

Those announced by HTTP as text/html, or those
with a valid HTML doctype (or both) ?  The first
would  allow a very large number of pseudo-XHTML
pages in ...

Philip TAYLOR

Received on Saturday, 30 August 2008 08:04:49 UTC