- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:43:54 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: >> It would appear the extent of adoption is pretty much limited to >> Microsoft >> Office's HTML output so far. This is actually pretty strong evidence that >> the ability to unilaterally introduce and use proprietary vocabularies is >> not a widely needed feature. > > You can add RDF trackback in html comments. So that the file continue to > validate. In this case the vocabulary has been hidden because html > could not be extended without keeping validity. Yet another example where people resorted to hacks in order to work around the missing extensibility model. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 17:44:37 UTC