- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:07:15 -0400
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@us.ibm.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Julian - What you describe below is exactly what I would expect and hope for, thank you! Since the actual class name as an URL is simply an author-level item, I suggest that we ignore the topic of "authority" over a URI, to keep us from having more questions like the ones I asked. Thanks to all on this, I think that this is a good direction! J.Ja > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 10:55 AM > To: Justin James > Cc: 'Ian Hickson'; 'Sam Ruby'; 'HTML WG' > Subject: Re: Pseudo-namespaces > > > Justin James wrote: > >> Could you elaborate on that? Are you wondering whether a syntax like > >> this could be used to automatically download associated scripts? (to > >> which my answer would be: hopefully not :-) > > > > For example, if the page I am authoring is located at: > > http://www.sitea.com/pages/page4.html > > > > and it contains a class name: > > http://www.someothersite.com/price > > > > what happens? Should it be rejected? Let's make it even more > interesting... let's say the style sheet I used came from: > > Nothing happens. It's just a name. > > > http://www.someothersite.com/css/style1.css > > > > Now, the class comes from the same pseudo-namespace (as I have > decided to call this concept) as the stylesheet. Does that change the > dynamics at all? > > > > Or to rephrase, should the browser be performing any kind of security > checks/sandboxing/cross domain restrictions on the pseudo-namespace, > even though it does not mean a hill of beans at the CSS level? Or > should the browser treat all class names a "dumb values", even if it > does not (as we hashed out in the last message) actually > download/execute/etc. a pseudo-namespaced class? > > > > I think it should not enforce anything here, but we may want to. > > The name is an identifier only, just in an XML namespace. > > For instance, you can use the XHTML namespace without having authority > over w3.org. > > BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2008 04:08:02 UTC