- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:00:53 -0400
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- CC: "'Toby A Inkster'" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Justin James wrote: > I agree, it would be much more consistent for a javascript: protocol item in > the src to be executed as JavaScript. In fact, I would content that: > > <img src="javascript:..." /> > > should be allowed So do a number of other people. And the current HTML5 draft allows it. So I'm not sure what the problem is, exactly. -Boris
Received on Monday, 11 August 2008 18:01:48 UTC