RE: GRDDL from Justin James on 2008-08-07 (public-html@w3.org from August 2008)

From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:37:26 -0400
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: "'Toby A Inkster'" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <08b101c8f847$4ae160f0$e0a422d0$@com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Julian Reschke
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 4:56 AM
> To: Henri Sivonen
> Cc: Toby A Inkster; Justin James; public-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: GRDDL
> 
> That being said, I'd be excited if we could make progress with the
> RDFa-in-HTML issue (which *is* in our charter).

This seems like a much better idea that GRDDL to me, especially if RDFa uses
a simpler syntax than RDF.

J.Ja

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 04:38:39 UTC