www-style@w3.org from July 2005 by author

Adam Kuehn

• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)

Al Gilman

• [CSS21] as-rendered properties (Thursday, 21 July)
• [CSS21] access to system values of presentation properties (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Friday, 15 July)

Allan Sandfeld Jensen

• Re: rows with display:table (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Friday, 22 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Friday, 22 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• CSS design goal, was: Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3-values] calc() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3-values] not specifying type in attr() might cause extension problems (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3-values] missing units (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3-mediaqueries] 6.2. width - negative <length> allowed? (Saturday, 23 July)
• [css3-mediaqueries] 6.2. height typo (Friday, 22 July)
• [css3-page] combining pseudo-classes (Friday, 15 July)
• [css3-page] initial containing block for the root element (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)

arcticmac

• Re: [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion (Thursday, 21 July)

ben

• Re: [css3-background] suggestion of alternate method for drawing shadows (Tuesday, 17 May)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Thursday, 21 July)
• FW: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees (Thursday, 21 July)

Ben Ward

• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Friday, 8 July)

Bert Bos

• [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [css3-values] missing units (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Image doesn't display (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Sunday, 31 July)
• [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Thursday, 21 July)
• [CSS21] Question on definition of containing block for abs pos elements (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)

Brian Sexton

• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)

Chris Lilley

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)

Christian Roth

• [CSS21] Chapter 4: Syntax - comments (Wednesday, 13 July)

Christoph Päper

• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: rows with display:table (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: Hypothetical Syntax of Variables (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Hypothetical Syntax of Variables (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 8 July)
• [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Thursday, 7 July)

Christopher Aillon

• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)

David Woolley

• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: Hypothetical Syntax of Variables (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Friday, 1 July)

Elliotte Harold

• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)

Emrah BASKAYA

• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Clip will be more useful with percentages (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows (Friday, 1 July)

Ernest Cline

• FW: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees (Tuesday, 19 July)
• [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees (Tuesday, 19 July)

Etan Wexler

• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs (Saturday, 9 July)
• Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 7 July)
• Meth fund: another way forward for CSS (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)

fantasai

• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] 2 Editorial Notes + Hyphenation Files (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 (Thursday, 30 June)

Felix Miata

• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: Editorial Comment on CSS3 Values and Units (and perhaps other specs) (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)

fora@annevankesteren.nl

• Re: [css3-values] missing units (Sunday, 31 July)
• [css3] @page nested inside @media (Thursday, 7 July)

Geoff Soutter

• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Friday, 22 July)
• [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Thursday, 21 July)
• [CSS21] out of scope counter-reset inconsistency? (Wednesday, 20 July)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: acid2 (Friday, 1 July)
• acid2 (Friday, 1 July)

Ian Hickson

• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css21] stacking order on non-replaced, inline boxes (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: multimedia-level property (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: The process of the CSS WG (was: Is There a Problem?) (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: several messages from Orion Adrian (Tuesday, 12 July)
• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Tuesday, 5 July)
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS3UI] x/y cursor hotspot values (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion (Friday, 1 July)

Ineke van der Maat

• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)

j.j.

• [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings (Sunday, 17 July)
• [CSS21] HTML examples should use HTML 4.01 DTD (Friday, 15 July)

Jan Brasna

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)

Jens Meiert

• Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope (Thursday, 7 July)

Karl Dubost

• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Friday, 15 July)
• [CSS21] General comment (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] Editorial - typo, missing space (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] Editorial - Image doesn't display (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] HTML 4.0 versus HTML 4.01 (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] Unicode and conforming User Agent (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example (Wednesday, 13 July)
• [CSS21] typo: illegal characters (Thursday, 7 July)
• [CSS21] Proof of CSS 2.1 / CSS 2.0 (Thursday, 7 July)
• [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Thursday, 7 July)

Kelly Miller

• Fixes To Positioning Model (was: New Layout Language) (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)

Kris@meridian-ds.com

• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)

L. David Baron

• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Friday, 22 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Nested Counters and Scope (Friday, 22 July)
• Re: [CSS21] access to system values of presentation properties (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: [CSS21] as-rendered properties (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: [CSS21] out of scope counter-reset inconsistency? (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)

Lachlan Hunt

• [CSS21] Fixed Table Layout - Columns (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• [CSS21] Border Conflict Resolution (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)

Laurens Holst

• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] calc() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] New WD for Values & Units (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Editorial - Layout of Good/Bad example (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• The www-style CSS FAQ update. (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs (Saturday, 9 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Saturday, 9 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Dimensions better than unitless numbers for future CSS specs (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• The process of the CSS WG (was: Is There a Problem?) (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Sunday, 3 July)
• Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)

Leonardo Rojas

• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 15 July)

Manuel Strehl

• Re: rows with display:table (Friday, 29 July)
• rows with display:table (Thursday, 28 July)

Mark Birbeck

• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Tuesday, 5 July)
• RE: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? (Tuesday, 5 July)
• RE: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Saturday, 2 July)

Mark Moore

• RE: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Saturday, 2 July)

Martijn

• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• [CSS21] out-of-date references (Friday, 15 July)
• [CSS21] Test suite for "Features at risk"? (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 (Friday, 1 July)

Matthew Raymond

• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Saturday, 16 July)
• Re: [CSS21] HTML 4.0 versus HTML 4.01 (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)

Norman Walsh

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)

Orion Adrian

• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: [css3-values] attr() function (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Server and Client Capabilities (Where Info. Should Be Located) (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Backwards and Forwards Compatability (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Fwd: several messages from Orion Adrian (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Versioning of CSS (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Friday, 8 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Proposal: Allow Support for Multiple External Style Sheets with Limited Scope (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (was: The Progress of CSS) (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Primer for layout/formatting split. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• New layout language. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Primer for layout/formatting split. (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Why aren't styled language repsonsible for pseudo-classes? (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Is There a Problem? (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: Proposal: :column pseudo-class (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: The Progress of CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• The Core Beliefs of Usability and Their CSS Application (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion (Friday, 1 July)
• CSS ID, xml:id confusion (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Friday, 1 July)

P.Taylor

• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)

Paul Nelson \(TYPOGRAPHY\)

• RE: CSS3 Thai line breaking (Thursday, 28 July)

Peter Williams

• RE: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: [selectors] Yet another attempt at trees (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: [CSS21] font-size of HTML headings (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: New layout language. (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: acid2 (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: acid2 (Friday, 1 July)

Rob Mientjes

• Re: [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion (Thursday, 28 July)
• [css3-background] Background-attachment and a new suggestion (Monday, 18 July)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Unitless dimensions (Tuesday, 5 July)

Ryan Cannon

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: CSS ID, xml:id confusion (Friday, 1 July)

Slalomsk8er

• Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc. (Friday, 15 July)

Toni Ruottu

• multimedia-level property (Thursday, 7 July)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 July 2005 21:18:02 UTC