W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2005

Re: [CSS21] Features at risk: quote in CSS or Q in HTML

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0507131941070.7450@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Karl Dubost wrote:
> 
> I'm just saying that dropping the CSS feature seems to me dangerous 
> because it has been shown that it was ?difficult? to implement on the 
> HTML side.
> 
> Then I was wondering if the CSS property would make it easier by not 
> having a table of all cases, and leaving the freedom to author to 
> specify the right characters.
> 
> Is it clearer? :)

I understand what you're saying, but I don't understand what you want us 
(the CSSWG) to do. The feature, if it isn't implemented yet remains in the 
spec, will prevent us from leaving CR. Thus, we are saying that if it 
isn't implemented, we'll remove it so that we can exit CR.

This applies to *every single feature in the draft*, the ones that are in 
the "at risk" section are simply those that we believe are likely to be 
the ones that will take the longest to be interoperably implemented (and 
that would thus, if we didn't remove them, block us from exiting CR). By 
listing them as "at risk", we are allowed to simply remove them and go to 
PR, instead of having to go back to LC first. It's just a process thing.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2005 19:46:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:39 GMT