Re: [CSS3 Color] Percentages in Alpha Value etc.

Christoph Päper wrote:

> Although it should have happened a while ago, if the expected behavior 
> is not (re)defined now, it never can.

I think so too. This should be ‘fixed’ before it is widely implemented...

> No, inconsistent. I assume the WG did not include this, because of 
> typos: #FFF and #FFFFFF are easily dinstinguished and two, four, five 
> or seven digits are always typos that yield no color, but with #FFFF 
> (and #FFFFFFFF) possible, the short forms (three or four digits) could 
> be typos of each other. Five and seven digits staid always being 
> typos, though.

If that is the case, I don’t find that a very convincing reason :).

> The way it is now, is just stupid.

Yeah...


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.