W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2005

Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 18:11:34 +0200
Message-ID: <42C95FB6.1020904@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Orion Adrian wrote:

>You are correct and I mixed them mixed them up. I meant to say XHTML
>1.1 (which has no variations like Strict).
>  
>
XHTML 1.1 is just an application of XHTML Modularisation. It is 
relatively easy to add things to it, and create your own version of 
XHTML which does contain all the transitional stuff. I do not think you 
should consider XHTML 1.1 as a specification on its own as much as a 
base for languages using XHTML Modularisation to work on. XHTML 1.1 
happens to not include any deprecated material, but all the deprecated 
material still exists in XHTML Modularisation.


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Monday, 4 July 2005 16:11:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:39 GMT