RE: [techs] text equivalents in links
[techs] Update Test Matrix
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 31 March 2004
Italian accessibility law - Complete english text
Italian accessibility law - English translation
agenda 4-1-04
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004
- Next week regrets
FW: [techlunch] FW: NCD FYI: Article: AIIM meeting sets PDF/Access standard in motion
Error in CSS Techniques for WCAG 1.0 sample code
[techs] text euiqvalents in links
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
- RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links
Another attempt at the conformance levels (was Action item: Proposed rewrite of conformance section)
Action item: proposed rewrite of conformance section
PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
- Re: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
- RE: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES
FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 24 March 2004
2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect
conformance related issues
agenda Details
Proposed rewording for 3.1 SC (was Clever Keys, dictionary.com, etc.)
Public comment on WCAG in the UK
agenda 3-25-04
- Re: agenda 3-25-04
- RE: agenda 3-25-04
- Regrets, teleconference 3-25-04
- Regrets: agenda 3-25-04
- Re: agenda 3-25-04
Opera announces new browser with embedded IBM ViaVoice
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004
Real Time Captioning
CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
- RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located"
Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
- Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?
[techs] granularity and testing...
APPLE previews Mac OS X Spoken Interface
Personae
Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- R: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
- Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism.
NO Teleconf Call this week
Fwd: redesign of QA Framework
[techs] CANCELLED Techniques Teleconference 17 March 2004
my comments on the last draft
2.4 Facilitate the ability of users to orient themselves and move within the content
colors
[1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations?
Comments On Draft: Principle 1
Re: PDF
Comments on draft. part 1.
spelling errors in new draft
Fw: WAI Glossary changelog
Regrets
Regrets March 11
FW: [Closed] Re: Request to publish WCAG 2.0 as WD
11 March 2004 Working Draft published
Regrets 3-11-04
FW: agenda 3-11-04
Regrets March 11
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 10 March 2004
[techs] Summary of Face to Face meeting, 4-5 March 2004
Regrets...RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004
Jason White's message - Should we move 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria to Gateway?
Should we move 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria to Gateway?
20 and 21 March F2F registration
edits.doc
regrets
rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4
[2.5] Benefits formulated as problems
[2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent)
[1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent)
RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
- RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- Re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- FW: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
- re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent)
TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, correct typo
TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
Working Draft - 2.0 - 1 March 2004
[2.3] Benefits formulated as problems (low priority)
[wcag2] Redirect issues
Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (Update) (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
[wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
- Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang'))
agenda 3-4-04
- Regrets Re: agenda 3-4-04
- New WD 2004-03-01 (Guideline 1.4 - 1.5)
- RE: agenda 3-4-04 (Regrets)
- Re: agenda 3-4-04
- Re: agenda 3-4-04
- RE: agenda 3-4-04
Proposed Level 3 success criterion for Guideline 3.1
1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
- RE: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
- Re: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4
[techs] CANCELLED Techniques Teleconference 03 March 2004
[techs] Test WCAG 1.0 7.4 and 7.5 (refresh and redirect)
[techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
- Re: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
- RE: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels
[techs] Agenda for Technical Plenary Face to Face
Telecon Today
[1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video
[1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video
proposed editorial changes (front matter and guideline 1.1)
[1.2 lvl2 SC] Synchronized equivalents not possible for real-time broadcasts
conformance level proposal
Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "predictable"
Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
- RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent"
RE 3.2 was 3.4
- Comments on 3.2 was 3.4 - Action item - proposed wording
- RE: RE 3.2 was 3.4
- safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4]
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 25 February 2004
Re: Consistency of Principles: change "should" to "must" in number 4
Revised proposal for Guideline 3.2 (was Proposed rewording for Guieline 3.4)
Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks
Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- Re: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
- RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource?
[TECH] mapping HTML Techniques of 1.0 to 2.0 techniques.
top-down look at son-of-ABBR
bottom-up look at son-of-ABBR
John Slatin's Rework of 3.1 list of strategies for reducing complexity etc. Appendix E
Question on <abbr /> element use
Agenda 2-26-2004
- Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 - REGRETS
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- R: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Regrets: Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- Re: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
- RE: Agenda 2-26-2004
2.5 Clean Up
2.4 CLEANUP - Does NOT resolve all open issues
1.2 Cleanup
[techs/WCAG 1.0 errata] Test cases for WCAG 1.0 "until user agents" checkpoints
3 Editorial Changes to Front End
Normative formatting
Consistency of Principles
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 18 February 2004
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 February 2004
# Regrets for Thurs. telecon - will be traveling to tech. plenary
[wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
- Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')
FW: 2.3 cleanup
[btw] Accessibility & source analysis
Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis
[1.3] Summary of guideline 1.3
FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved
W3C Weekly News - 20 February 2004
[tech] Your WCAG Bugzilla 740
The Page Paradigm
[UBER 3.1] natural language can be identified?
FYI: Resources for splitting up compound words
Personae
Agenda
Doctype and Assistive Technologies
Issue Summaries for guidelines 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
UBER 3.1 proposal -- to combine 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 1.4
Bugs addressed by 2.3 rewrite
New proposed 2.3
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 February 2004
Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- Re: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
- RE: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4
RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper
Guideline 1.2 - Overview and summary
CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
- Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer
February 14, 2004 Working Draft Published
Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- Re: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
- RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0
TFOOT accessibility
Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
- Re: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
- RE: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines
late regrets
regrets
RE: Agenda - regrets
RE: Agenda (regrets)
[TECH] CSS techniques mapping the 1.0 Techniques to the 2.0 Techniques
11 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
regrets
W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2004
Agenda
Re: wcag727.htm (was Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example)
[css-techs] Issue# 725 - Applying same style sheet to both HTML and XML
[css-techs] Issue# 728 - Units of Measure
[css-techs] Issue# 727 - Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example
[css-techs] Issue# 726 - Order of CSS Concepts in Document
[techs] Hotel information for technical plenary meeting
[techs] Techniques Task Force Teleconference 11 February 2004
action item reminder
[html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
- RE: [html-techs] Table Type
- Re: [html-techs] Table Type
Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- RE: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
- Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5
Colour Contrast: what about opacity?
[techs] Technical Plenary registration
Betr.: Re: Conformance-logos
list of online dictionaries
Bookmarks for topics of interest
RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
- RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm
W3C Weekly News - 5 February 2004
Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries
[Tech] RDF Techniques - First attempt
Influence of valid code
Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Michael P Craddock, : regrets, will be traveling
04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Agenda 2/5/2004
Dutch quality mark initiative: Clarification of WCAG 1
diacritic marks
simple language testable thing
- Re: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
- RE: simple language testable thing
FW: [techlunch] MS study: The Wide Range of Abilities and Its Impact On Computer Technology
PC Shop
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 28 January 2004
Guideline 2.1 Proposal
Jan 29 minutes
Partial regrets for today
Regrets [WAS: Agenda]
Regrets
[btw] European Web Accessibility Policy
Agenda
Proposals for Principle 4
regrets for wednesday and thursday mtgs; request for scribe for thursday's call
fyi: limits of bandwidth
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 January 2004
RE: WCAG and some linguistics problems
[3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4
[techs] Blockquote (and how to propose?)
Action Item for Guideline 4.3
[3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4
22 Jan 2004 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Regrets Techniques Teleconference January 28, 2004
Action Item on Checkpoint 2.2
Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport!
Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport!
FW: [techlunch] U.N. Group Drafts Text Of International Disability Convention
Late regrets for Jan. 22
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 21 January 2004
DHTML Accessibility
thesis up on the web
Re: What DHTML
Re: TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links
TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,
This week's agenda
W3C Weekly News - 15 January 2004
Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
- RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3
[4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
- Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
- Late regrets, Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004
[techs] Action Item: Send list of ideas for test page
link to us: Is there a recommendation to provide a graphic for external linking? if so where?
Regrets and more belated regrets
Screen Enlargement Software
[techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004
belated regrets
Regrets [re: Draft agenda]
RE: action item: definition of Event Handler
Re: action item: definition of Event Handler
Draft agenda
[WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2
partial regrets, need someone to take minutes
Another interesting group
regrets for 30 min
action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
- Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface
Functions or outcomes that can be expressed in words
List of action items, incomplete minutes from 8 January
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 January 2004
BBC headline: Web opens up for learning disabled
Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
- Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
- Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW
Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal
question on WCAG 2.0
[techs] Summary of Techniques teleconference 07 January 2004
Regrets for today
regrets
Agenda
Regrets for TC
Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- RE: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
- Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features
Re: [techs] New draft: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 (A & R Units)
Regrets 8 January (+ happy new year everyone!)
[techs] Additional resource for text equivalents section
Re: Colour contrast verification tool
[techs] Announcement: Techniques task force face-to-face at W3C Technical Plenary
Re: 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X]
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004