- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:29:19 +0100
- To: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:19 PM Subject: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) Guideline 1.1 Current wording: For non-text content, provide text equivalents that serve the same purpose or convey the same information as the non-text content, except when the sole purpose of the non-text content is to create a specific sensory experience (for example, music and visual art) in which case a text label or description is sufficient. Proposed wording: Provide text equivalents for non-text content. Roberto: It is wrong... I suggest to "cut" it but not "cut" all: "Provide text equivalents for non-text content except when the functionality for non-text content is only decorative" Why this? Because in the case of decorative images for respect the DTD you need to apply the "alt" attribute but this must me empty. With your rewording, this decorative image must have a text equivalent. The other text can be moved in a success criteria: 1. in a specific sensory experience (for example, music and visual art) a text label or description is sufficient.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 14:29:31 UTC