w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2004 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4] (Thursday, 26 February)
• safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4] (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Thursday, 26 February)
• top-down look at son-of-ABBR (Wednesday, 25 February)
• bottom-up look at son-of-ABBR (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells (Thursday, 8 January)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 29 January)
• Action Item on Checkpoint 2.2 (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal (Thursday, 8 January)

Andy Heath

• Re: 3.3- time to take a step back? (Monday, 2 February)

Avi Arditti

• Late regrets 3-25 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Regrets March 11 (Thursday, 11 March)
• Late regrets for Jan. 22 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Agenda, regrets (Thursday, 8 January)

Ben Caldwell

• conformance related issues (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: agenda 3-4-04 (Regrets) (Thursday, 4 March)
• # Regrets for Thurs. telecon - will be traveling to tech. plenary (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: New proposed 2.3 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Issue Summaries for guidelines 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• February 14, 2004 Working Draft Published (Sunday, 15 February)
• Guideline 2.1 Proposal (Friday, 30 January)
• Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• Proposals for Principle 4 (Wednesday, 28 January)

by way of Wendy A Chisholm

• W3C Weekly News - 20 February 2004 (Friday, 20 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2004 (Wednesday, 11 February)
• RE: diacritic marks (Thursday, 5 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 5 February 2004 (Thursday, 5 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 15 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Wednesday, 7 January)

Carlos A Velasco

• Re: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Screen Reader and Bookmarking (Thursday, 1 April)
• regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism. (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Attachments Re: edits.doc (Friday, 5 March)
• re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• Regrets Re: agenda 3-4-04 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Friday, 27 February)
• Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Well-mannered discussion Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: diacritic marks (Friday, 6 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: diacritic marks (Friday, 6 February)
• erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• character sets RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• regrets Re: Agenda (Thursday, 29 January)
• [techs] Blockquote (and how to propose?) (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Wednesday, 21 January)
• regrets Re: This week's agenda (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: 2.1 Overview and proposal (Friday, 9 January)
• Regrets Re: Agenda (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Charles Oppermann

• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Chris O'Kennon

• RE: The Page Paradigm (Friday, 20 February)

Chris Ridpath

• Re: [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [html-techs] Table Type (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)

Craddock, Michael P

• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: agenda 4-1-04 (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: agenda 3-4-04 (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Consistency of Principles (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: New proposed 2.3 (Saturday, 21 February)
• RE: Agenda (regrets) (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Agenda (regrets) (Thursday, 12 February)
• Regrets [WAS: Agenda] (Thursday, 29 January)
• Regrets [re: Draft agenda] (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: action item: definition of Event Handler (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 8 January)

Dave Shea

• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Friday, 16 January)

David MacDonald

• spelling errors in new draft (Thursday, 11 March)
• Jason White's message - Should we move 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria to Gateway? (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Should we move 3.1 Level 3 Success Criteria to Gateway? (Monday, 8 March)
• rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4 (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, correct typo (Thursday, 4 March)
• TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• [TECH] mapping HTML Techniques of 1.0 to 2.0 techniques. (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [tech] Your WCAG Bugzilla 740 (Friday, 20 February)
• Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines (Thursday, 12 February)
• [TECH] CSS techniques mapping the 1.0 Techniques to the 2.0 Techniques (Wednesday, 11 February)
• TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: action item: definition of Event Handler (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: action item: definition of Event Handler (Thursday, 15 January)

david.donovan@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca

• Regrets...RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 February)
• regrets (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Regrets Techniques Teleconference January 28, 2004 (Monday, 26 January)

Doyle

• Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 - REGRETS (Wednesday, 25 February)

Doyle Burnett

• Re: agenda 4-1-04 (Thursday, 1 April)
• Working Draft - 2.0 - 1 March 2004 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: CSUN (Thursday, 19 February)
• Doctype and Assistive Technologies (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: list of online dictionaries (Friday, 6 February)
• Screen Enlargement Software (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Colour contrast verification tool (Tuesday, 6 January)

Eric Velleman

• Betr.: Re: Conformance-logos (Sunday, 8 February)

Geoff Deering

• Regrets for TC (Wednesday, 7 January)

Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)

• RE: agenda 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: Regrets March 11 (Thursday, 11 March)
• regrets (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• Comments on 3.2 was 3.4 - Action item - proposed wording (Thursday, 26 February)
• Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "predictable" (Thursday, 26 February)
• Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent" (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Agenda -late (Thursday, 19 February)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• agenda 4-1-04 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• RE: Action item: proposed rewrite of conformance section (Monday, 29 March)
• PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES (Saturday, 27 March)
• FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Friday, 26 March)
• agenda Details (Thursday, 25 March)
• agenda 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Monday, 22 March)
• RE: Personae (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: Personae (Thursday, 18 March)
• NO Teleconf Call this week (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: colors (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? - Additional note (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Monday, 15 March)
• pdf (Thursday, 11 March)
• FW: [Closed] Re: Request to publish WCAG 2.0 as WD (Thursday, 11 March)
• FW: agenda 3-11-04 (Thursday, 11 March)
• edits.doc (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [2.4] Text error in lvl 2 SC # 2 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• agenda 3-4-04 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4 (Monday, 1 March)
• Telecon Today (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent" (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: RE 3.2 was 3.4 (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE 3.2 was 3.4 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Dont get Edit Shock - it isnt as bad as it looks (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Wednesday, 25 February)
• John Slatin's Rework of 3.1 list of strategies for reducing complexity etc. Appendix E (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Wednesday, 25 February)
• 2.5 Clean Up (Wednesday, 25 February)
• 2.4 CLEANUP - Does NOT resolve all open issues (Wednesday, 25 February)
• 1.2 Cleanup (Wednesday, 25 February)
• 3 Editorial Changes to Front End (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Normative formatting (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Consistency of Principles (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: 2.3 cleanup- URL reference? (Tuesday, 24 February)
• FW: 2.3 cleanup (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis (Monday, 23 February)
• FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Sunday, 22 February)
• RE: New proposed 2.3 (Saturday, 21 February)
• RE: CSUN (Thursday, 19 February)
• UBER 3.1 proposal -- to combine 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 1.4 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Bugs addressed by 2.3 rewrite (Tuesday, 17 February)
• New proposed 2.3 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines (Sunday, 15 February)
• RE: [TECH] CSS techniques mapping the 1.0 Techniques to the 2.0 Techniques (Wednesday, 11 February)
• list of online dictionaries (Friday, 6 February)
• Michael P Craddock, : regrets, will be traveling (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Agenda 2/5/2004 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: Checklists Normative? (Sunday, 25 January)
• Checklists Normative? (Sunday, 25 January)
• RE: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Thursday, 15 January)
• regrets for 30 min (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: Functions or outcomes that can be expressed in words (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: 2.1 Overview and proposal (Friday, 9 January)
• regrets (Thursday, 8 January)

Henry S. Thompson

• Public comment on WCAG in the UK (Thursday, 25 March)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Friday, 26 March)

Ineke van der Maat

• Re: Conformance-logos (Sunday, 8 February)
• Re: Conformance-logos (Sunday, 8 February)
• Conformance-logos (Friday, 6 February)

Jason White

• RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Attachments Re: edits.doc (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent) (Friday, 5 March)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Agenda (Thursday, 29 January)
• This week's agenda (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Draft agenda (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Regrets Re: Agenda (Thursday, 8 January)
• Agenda (Thursday, 8 January)

Jenae Andershonis

• [techs] Update Test Matrix (Wednesday, 31 March)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004 (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: [techs/WCAG 1.0 errata] Test cases for WCAG 1.0 "until user agents" checkpoints (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [techs] Action Item: Send list of ideas for test page (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Jens Meiert

• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (2) (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Friday, 5 March)
• [wcag2] Redirect issues (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (Update) (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: top-down look at son-of-ABBR (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [btw] Accessibility & source analysis (Monday, 23 February)
• Absolute units (was: Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer) (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Conformance-logos (Monday, 9 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Friday, 6 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: character sets RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: simple language testable thing (Tuesday, 3 February)
• [btw] European Web Accessibility Policy (Thursday, 29 January)

Joe Clark

• RE: [techs] text equivalents in links (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Personae (Thursday, 18 March)
• Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: PDF (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis (Monday, 23 February)
• The Page Paradigm (Friday, 20 February)
• Personae (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: wcag727.htm (was Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest (Saturday, 7 February)
• Bookmarks for topics of interest (Friday, 6 February)
• RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm (Friday, 6 February)
• Influence of valid code (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: diacritic marks (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Checklists Normative? (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: What DHTML (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: TECH: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2 (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Screen Enlargement Software (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: List of action items, incomplete minutes from 8 January (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X] (Tuesday, 6 January)

John M Slatin

• RE: Screen Reader and Bookmarking (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Tuesday, 30 March)
• FW: [techlunch] FW: NCD FYI: Article: AIIM meeting sets PDF/Access standard in motion (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Monday, 29 March)
• Another attempt at the conformance levels (was Action item: Proposed rewrite of conformance section) (Monday, 29 March)
• Action item: proposed rewrite of conformance section (Monday, 29 March)
• RE: PLEASE DONT INCLUDE PEOPLE ON LIST WITH LIST ADDRESSES (Monday, 29 March)
• Proposed rewording for 3.1 SC (was Clever Keys, dictionary.com, etc.) (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Opera announces new browser with embedded IBM ViaVoice (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: Attachments Re: edits.doc (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [2.3] Benefits formulated as problems (low priority) (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Proposed Level 3 success criterion for Guideline 3.1 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Tuesday, 2 March)
• RE: Telecon Today (Tuesday, 2 March)
• RE: safe selection [was: Re: RE 3.2 was 3.4] (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: RE 3.2 was 3.4 (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent" (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: 3 Editorial Changes to Front End (Wednesday, 25 February)
• FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Consistency of Principles: change "should" to "must" in number 4 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Revised proposal for Guideline 3.2 (was Proposed rewording for Guieline 3.4) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Consistency of Principles (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• FW: [techlunch] MS study: The Wide Range of Abilities and Its Impact On Computer Technology (Monday, 2 February)
• RE: Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• Partial regrets for today (Thursday, 29 January)
• FW: [techlunch] U.N. Group Drafts Text Of International Disability Convention (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Regrets for today (Thursday, 8 January)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• DHTML Accessibility (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• link to us: Is there a recommendation to provide a graphic for external linking? if so where? (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: BBC headline: Web opens up for learning disabled (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)
• no script and plugin conundrum: help needed (Thursday, 1 January)

Judy Brewer

• RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm (Friday, 6 February)

Jukka K. Korpela

• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft (Tuesday, 24 February)

Kathryn Ann Clancy

• thesis up on the web (Thursday, 22 January)

ken kipnes

• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)

Kerstin Goldsmith

• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Regrets March 11 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: 1.6 (was 1.5) cleanup proposal + proposal to merge with 2.4 (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Consistency of Principles (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Use of the word "appropriate" in 2.0 guidelines (Thursday, 12 February)
• late regrets (Thursday, 12 February)
• Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Agenda (Friday, 30 January)
• belated regrets (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Agenda, regrets (Thursday, 8 January)

Kynn Bartlett

• Re: [techs] text equivalents in links (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Bookmarks for topics of interest (Saturday, 7 February)
• What Experts Are (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Wednesday, 21 January)

Lee Roberts

• Screen Reader and Bookmarking (Wednesday, 31 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: New proposed 2.3 (Saturday, 21 February)
• regrets (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Tuesday, 13 January)

Lee Walters

• RE: The Page Paradigm (Friday, 20 February)

lisa seeman

• Next week regrets (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Types of content (Monday, 29 March)
• RE: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Sunday, 28 March)
• RE: [techs] granularity and testing... (Thursday, 18 March)
• RE: Personae (Thursday, 18 March)
• RE: [techs] tester reliability (Thursday, 18 March)
• [techs] granularity and testing... (Thursday, 18 March)
• RE: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: colors (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: colors -the other foot (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: [techs] CANCELLED Techniques - and an apology.. (Tuesday, 16 March)
• my comments on the last draft (Monday, 15 March)
• 2.4 Facilitate the ability of users to orient themselves and move within the content (Monday, 15 March)
• colors (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• CSUN (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Monday, 9 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Sunday, 8 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Sunday, 8 February)
• [Tech] RDF Techniques - First attempt (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: 3.3- time to take a step back? (Tuesday, 3 February)
• diacritic marks (Tuesday, 3 February)
• simple language testable thing (Tuesday, 3 February)
• 3.3- time to take a step back? (Monday, 2 February)
• RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Sunday, 25 January)
• Another interesting group (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)
• 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X] (Monday, 5 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: agenda 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: CSUN (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Action Item for Guideline 4.3 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Sunday, 25 January)

Marco Bertoni

• Error in CSS Techniques for WCAG 1.0 sample code (Tuesday, 30 March)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Wednesday, 24 March)

Matt May

• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: R: 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: agenda 3-4-04 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 12 February)

Maurice Franceschi

• question on WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 8 January)

Maurizio Boscarol

• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)

Maurizio Vittoria

• RE: Agenda, regrets (Thursday, 8 January)

Michael Cooper

• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 31 March 2004 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 31 March 2004 (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Tuesday, 30 March)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 24 March 2004 (Friday, 26 March)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 24 March 2004 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• [techs] CANCELLED Techniques Teleconference 17 March 2004 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 10 March 2004 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• [techs] Summary of Face to Face meeting, 4-5 March 2004 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 March 2004 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• [techs] CANCELLED Techniques Teleconference 03 March 2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels (Friday, 27 February)
• [techs] Test WCAG 1.0 7.4 and 7.5 (refresh and redirect) (Friday, 27 February)
• [techs] Action to test WCAG 1.0 10.2 - form labels (Friday, 27 February)
• [techs] Agenda for Technical Plenary Face to Face (Friday, 27 February)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 25 February 2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 18 February 2004 (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 February 2004 (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 February 2004 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 16 February)
• Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Agenda - regrets (Thursday, 12 February)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 28 January 2004 (Friday, 30 January)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 January 2004 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 21 January 2004 (Thursday, 22 January)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Friday, 16 January)
• action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 14 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconference 07 January 2004 (Thursday, 8 January)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Tuesday, 6 January)

Mike Barta

• RE: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Wednesday, 4 February)

Mirabella, Mathew J

• Comments On Draft: Principle 1 (Friday, 12 March)
• Comments on draft. part 1. (Thursday, 11 March)

Montgomery, Gordon

• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)

patrizia.andronico@iat.cnr.it

• PC Shop (Saturday, 31 January)

Reuven Nisser

• RE: rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4 (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: diacritic marks from by way of Wendy A Chisholm (Friday, 6 February)
• RE: diacritic marks (Friday, 6 February)
• FW: diacritic marks (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: diacritic marks (Thursday, 5 February)

Richard Ishida

• RE: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: Doctype and Assistive Technologies (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Summaries of issues around checkpoints 1.4 and 1.5 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: diacritic marks (Tuesday, 3 February)
• RE: WCAG and some linguistics problems (Tuesday, 27 January)

Roberto Castaldo

• Italian accessibility law - Complete english text (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Italian accessibility law - English translation (Wednesday, 31 March)
• R: 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect (Friday, 26 March)
• R: [techs] granularity and testing... (Thursday, 18 March)
• R: [techs] granularity and testing... (Thursday, 18 March)
• R: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism. (Wednesday, 17 March)
• R: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• R: my comments on the last draft (Monday, 15 March)
• Regrets 3-11-04 (Thursday, 11 March)
• R: New WD 2004-03-01 (Guideline 1.4 - 1.5) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• R: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Guideline 1.2 - Overview and summary (Sunday, 15 February)
• RE: Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries (Sunday, 8 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 29 January)

Roberto Ellero

• Regrets, teleconference 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Agenda - Late regrets (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Late regrets [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 January 2004 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Late regrets, Techniques Teleconference 21 January 2004 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Late regrets, Techniques Teleconference 14 January 2004 (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

• RE: Opera announces new browser with embedded IBM ViaVoice (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Screen Enlargement Software (Saturday, 17 January)

Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

• Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 26 March)
• Regrets: agenda 3-25-04 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Real Time Captioning (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Friday, 19 March)
• Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? (Thursday, 18 March)
• APPLE previews Mac OS X Spoken Interface (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Sunday, 14 March)
• Re: spelling errors in new draft (Thursday, 11 March)
• Fw: WAI Glossary changelog (Thursday, 11 March)
• Regrets (Thursday, 11 March)
• re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: agenda 3-4-04 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links, (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [wcag2] 4.1 Identifying changes in language (was: Re: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang')) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• New WD 2004-03-01 (Guideline 1.4 - 1.5) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Agenda (regrets) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Sunday, 15 February)
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Task Force Teleconference 11 February 2004 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Colour Contrast: what about opacity? (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: [techs] Technical Plenary registration (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: Conformance-logos (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: Jan 29 minutes (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: [btw] European Web Accessibility Policy (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: test (VIRUS) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [3.4] Overview and summary of guideline 3.4 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Agenda, regrets (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 07 January 2004 (Tuesday, 6 January)

Sailesh Panchang

• Regrets: Re: Agenda 2-26-2004 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: 2.3 cleanup- URL reference? (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Monday, 23 February)
• Regrets Feb 19 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Action item: Proposed wording for Guideline 3.4 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: TFOOT accessibility (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells (Friday, 9 January)
• Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells (Wednesday, 7 January)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Tuesday, 23 March)

Tim Boland

• Fwd: redesign of QA Framework (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [css-techs] Issue# 725 - Applying same style sheet to both HTML and XML (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [css-techs] Issue# 728 - Units of Measure (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [css-techs] Issue# 727 - Add browser support section to each CSS concept section/example (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [css-techs] Issue# 726 - Order of CSS Concepts in Document (Tuesday, 10 February)

Tom Croucher

• RE: Personae (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: R: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism. (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism. (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Regrets and more belated regrets (Friday, 16 January)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Re: Proposal for WCAG conformance mechanism. (Friday, 19 March)
• CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Comments on draft. part 1. (Friday, 12 March)
• 11 March 2004 Working Draft published (Thursday, 11 March)
• 20 and 21 March F2F registration (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Telecon Today (Sunday, 29 February)
• Re: 1.2 Cleanup (Thursday, 26 February)
• proposed editorial changes (front matter and guideline 1.1) (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [techs/WCAG 1.0 errata] Test cases for WCAG 1.0 "until user agents" checkpoints (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: CSUN (Friday, 20 February)
• RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 February)
• 11 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes (Wednesday, 11 February)
• [techs] Hotel information for technical plenary meeting (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [techs] Techniques Task Force Teleconference 11 February 2004 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• action item reminder (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [techs] Technical Plenary registration (Monday, 9 February)
• [techs] Technical Plenary registration (Monday, 9 February)
• Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries (Thursday, 5 February)
• 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes (Wednesday, 4 February)
• regrets for wednesday and thursday mtgs; request for scribe for thursday's call (Wednesday, 28 January)
• fyi: limits of bandwidth (Tuesday, 27 January)
• 22 Jan 2004 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 14 January 2004 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [WCAG 1.0 Errata] Process questions (was: Re: [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [WCAG 1.0 Errata: Issue #14] Checkpoint 10.2 (Wednesday, 14 January)
• partial regrets, need someone to take minutes (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Functions or outcomes that can be expressed in words (Monday, 12 January)
• List of action items, incomplete minutes from 8 January (Monday, 12 January)
• BBC headline: Web opens up for learning disabled (Monday, 12 January)
• Notes from Matt McMahon presentation on color blindness at UW (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: question on WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Use of Axis in data-table for categorizing cells (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: [techs] New draft: CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 (A & R Units) (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [techs] Additional resource for text equivalents section (Wednesday, 7 January)
• [techs] Announcement: Techniques task force face-to-face at W3C Technical Plenary (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: 1.4 text in the content is provided in Unicode or sufficient information is provided so that it can be automatically mapped back to Unicode. [X] (Tuesday, 6 January)

Will Smith

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! (Sunday, 25 January)
• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! (Sunday, 25 January)

Yvette P. Hoitink

• Regrets (RE: agenda 4-1-04) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• RE: Another attempt at the conformance levels (was Action item: Proposed rewrite of conformance section) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: [techs] text euiqvalents in links (Tuesday, 30 March)
• 2 or 3 levels: beware of the compromise effect (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: CleverKeys, dictionary.com and "programmatically located" (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: Personae (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Sunday, 14 March)
• [1.1] Text-equivalents for illustrations? (Sunday, 14 March)
• Regrets March 11 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• RE: [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent) (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: rewrites of 3.1 Level 2 Suc #4 (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• [2.5] Benefits formulated as problems (Thursday, 4 March)
• [2.5] Extra succes criterion (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• FW: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• [1.1] Exception for text equivalent (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) (Thursday, 4 March)
• [2.3] Benefits formulated as problems (low priority) (Thursday, 4 March)
• [2.4] Text error in lvl 2 SC # 2 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: 3 Editorial Changes to Front End (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video (Thursday, 26 February)
• [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video (Thursday, 26 February)
• [1.2 SC 5] Requiring equivalents for real-time non-interactive video (Thursday, 26 February)
• [1.2 lvl2 SC] Synchronized equivalents not possible for real-time broadcasts (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: conformance level proposal (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 3.2 (was 3.4) - Alternatives to "consistent" (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Question on <abbr /> element use (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Proposed New 1.3 based on Yvette's Analysis (+ new examples) (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [1.3] Summary of guideline 1.3 (Sunday, 22 February)
• [UBER 3.1] natural language can be identified? (Thursday, 19 February)
• FYI: Resources for splitting up compound words (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: [html-techs] Table Type (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Request for volunteers: Guideline summaries (Saturday, 7 February)
• Dutch quality mark initiative: Clarification of WCAG 1 (Tuesday, 3 February)
• RE: simple language testable thing (Tuesday, 3 February)
• RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Sunday, 25 January)
• RE: Summary of Bugzilla comments on checkpoint/guideline 3.3 (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• RE: action item: clarified definition of keyboard interface (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Regrets 8 January (+ happy new year everyone!) (Wednesday, 7 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2004 22:21:45 UTC