- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:00:07 +0100
- To: "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>, "Marja-Riitta Koivunen" <marja@annotea.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org> To: "Marja-Riitta Koivunen" <marja@annotea.org> Cc: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:17 PM Subject: Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? MM: Systems that store, retrieve and process data are what we call authoring tools. The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 draft defines "authoring tool" [1] as: "Any software or service that authors may use to create or modify Web content for publication." Roberto: Yes Matt, you said right that this is a Draft. But at now there are W3C Reccomendations that contain a similar definition? Otherwise we have the problem of connection between WCAG 1.0 and ATAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 draft to ATAG 2.0 draft....
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 09:01:46 UTC