W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:00:07 +0100
Message-ID: <01b501c4133a$b6f99f60$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>, "Marja-Riitta Koivunen" <marja@annotea.org>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>
To: "Marja-Riitta Koivunen" <marja@annotea.org>
Cc: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>;
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?

Systems that store, retrieve and process data are what we call
authoring tools.
The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 draft defines
"authoring tool" [1] as:
"Any software or service that authors may use to create or modify Web
content for publication."

Yes Matt, you said right that this is a Draft. But at now there are W3C
Reccomendations that contain a similar definition? Otherwise we have the
problem of connection between WCAG 1.0 and ATAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 draft
to ATAG 2.0 draft....
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 09:01:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC