- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:56:45 -0600
- To: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like the idea of including the browser-functionality information, but as part of the goad to "realism" shall we also include figures on market share? (Last time I checked, Opera had less than 1% of the browser market; Netscape had just over 3%). John "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Cooper Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 12:54 pm To: WAI WCAG List Subject: RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer Perhaps this issue will be addressed in part by an approach we are taking in the techniques, which is, for each technique, we log the user agents for which there is a known problem the technique addresses. So we could create a technique that says, in effect, "If your target browser includes IE, the author must use relative font sizes. If your target browser is only Opera, the author can use absolute sizes and still be assured that the page will be WCAG-compliant for the user." It is of course the author's responsibility to be realistic about the browsers used by their audience and not try to use this browser profiling as a way to wriggle out of the techniques, but a level of good faith in implementors of our guidelines must be presumed at some point. It is also of course probable that the set of browsers out there will be larger than the set of browsers we have tested and aligned with our techniques, but all we can do is our best at getting a good cross section, and the techniques are easily updated if we become aware of a browser with its own issues. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: John M Slatin [mailto:john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu] > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 10:27 AM > To: Yvette P. Hoitink; Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG; WAI WCAG List > Subject: RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer > > > > I think Yvette's right; as Joe Clark has pointed out (often) in the > past, the fact that IE won't allow users to enlarge fonts specified in > px is primarily a user agent problem, though for the time being it > has implications for content. So the Techniques documents should > acknowledge the problem and encourage use of relative sizes, while the > user agent issue should be addressed as well. >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 13:56:46 UTC